From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] drm/i915/registers: use standard bits.h and bitfield.h macros
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:44:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sh1vs29c.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1538040594.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
> I'm not necessarily proposing pushing the patches in this series;
> they're more of a piece-by-piece transformation of the power sequencer
> macros and code to use the above macros, to give an idea what the end
> result would look like.
And if it isn't clear from the above, I'm *not* soliciting detailed
patch review on the series. More like meta review, what worries do you
have for wider usage, etc.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-27 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-27 9:40 [RFC 0/4] drm/i915/registers: use standard bits.h and bitfield.h macros Jani Nikula
2018-09-27 9:40 ` [RFC 1/4] drm/i915/registers: prefer GENMASK() over hand rolled masks Jani Nikula
2018-09-28 8:34 ` Mika Kuoppala
2018-09-27 9:40 ` [RFC 2/4] drm/i915/registers: prefer BIT() for single bits Jani Nikula
2018-09-27 9:40 ` [RFC 3/4] drm/i915/registers: deprecate _SHIFT in favor of FIELD_GET() and _MASK Jani Nikula
2018-09-27 9:40 ` [RFC 4/4] drm/i915/registers: define field values using FIELD_PREP() Jani Nikula
2018-09-27 10:35 ` Chris Wilson
2018-09-27 11:53 ` Jani Nikula
2018-09-27 12:44 ` Jani Nikula
2018-09-27 12:02 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-09-27 9:44 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2018-09-27 11:09 ` [RFC 0/4] drm/i915/registers: use standard bits.h and bitfield.h macros Michal Wajdeczko
2018-09-27 11:22 ` Jani Nikula
2018-09-27 11:44 ` Jani Nikula
2018-09-27 14:20 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sh1vs29c.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.