From: Vincent Bernat <vincent@bernat.im>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, jbenc@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] veth: replace iflink by a dedicated symlink in sysfs
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 22:51:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87si7bt5ca.fsf@zoro.exoscale.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150820.140734.195153496258370626.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:07:34 -0700 (PDT)")
❦ 20 août 2015 14:07 -0700, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> :
>>>> I also don't know what is the best way to handle this. veth advertises
>>>> its peer via IFLA_LINK since 4.1, so it's too late to change it for
>>>> this
>>>> release.
>>>
>>> Apparently we need to pick our poison. Either way, we break something.
>> Sure. I would prefer to have the same mechanism in all version, but I
>> can live with the other solution.
>>
>> David, any thoughts about this?
>
> You can't break the 4.1 semantics, it's in a released kernel and people
> _ARE_ using it.
I had a look at what other kind of daemons may exploit the pre-4.1
semantics (of not having an infinite loop when following iflink) and
failed to find any other users than "lldpd". Other LLDP daemons (lldpad,
ladvd, openlldpd) have other ways to find the lower interface. I would
also have thought that NetSNMP would use it to implement ifStackTable
but it doesn't in fact implement this table.
--
It were not best that we should all think alike; it is difference of opinion
that makes horse-races.
-- Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar"
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-22 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <87fv3ier4s.fsf@zoro.exoscale.ch>
2015-08-19 6:44 ` Regression in 4.1 with veth and IFLA_LINK Vincent Bernat
2015-08-19 6:44 ` [PATCH] veth: replace iflink by a dedicated symlink in sysfs Vincent Bernat
2015-08-19 11:00 ` Jiri Benc
2015-08-19 12:13 ` Vincent Bernat
2015-08-19 12:38 ` Jiri Benc
2015-08-19 12:48 ` Vincent Bernat
2015-08-19 16:33 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-08-20 11:53 ` Jiri Benc
2015-08-20 14:31 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-08-20 21:07 ` David Miller
2015-08-22 20:51 ` Vincent Bernat [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87si7bt5ca.fsf@zoro.exoscale.ch \
--to=vincent@bernat.im \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.