From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Kastrup Subject: Re: AW: Understanding behavior of git blame -M Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 09:02:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87sikwdihs.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <71BF70CE41AEE741896AF3A5450D86F11F28C762@DEFTHW99EH3MSX.ww902.siemens.net> <874mxderwj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <71BF70CE41AEE741896AF3A5450D86F11F28C786@DEFTHW99EH3MSX.ww902.siemens.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: "git\@vger.kernel.org" To: "Sokolov\, Konstantin \(ext\)" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Aug 16 09:06:35 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XIY4P-0006IV-LT for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 09:06:34 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751453AbaHPHEO (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Aug 2014 03:04:14 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:38146 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751042AbaHPHEN (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Aug 2014 03:04:13 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37188 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XIY1z-00030B-JX; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 03:04:03 -0400 Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EB5C0E17E0; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 09:02:55 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <71BF70CE41AEE741896AF3A5450D86F11F28C786@DEFTHW99EH3MSX.ww902.siemens.net> (Konstantin Sokolov's message of "Fri, 15 Aug 2014 20:54:48 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Sokolov, Konstantin (ext)" writes: > Hi David, > > thank you very much for the exhaustive answer. The keyword "hunk" made > me try a little bit more. So I realized that -M works as expected when > at least three lines are moved. > > From your answer I discern that you find the current behavior > correct. I don't say any such thing and don't imply it. -- David Kastrup