From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WOOGE-0004y0-FQ for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:18:39 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: Performance of ath10k References: Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:18:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Vu Hai NGUYEN's message of "Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:05:21 +0100") Message-ID: <87siql87fz.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Vu Hai NGUYEN Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Vu Hai NGUYEN writes: > I'm doing an internship for6 month and my mission is implementation a > module of 802.11ac in a mini cpu to create an access point of wifi. > After looking in the internet for a while, I found this potential > product from Compex: > http://www.compex.com.sg/productdetailinfo.asp?model=WLE900VX I wonder > if is there anyone here have tried this with the driver ath10k and > does it work well or there's still many bugs? FWIW I'm using ath10k on my main AP at home on 5G (and ath9k on 2.4G) and I haven't recently had any major problems preventing use. The uptime right now is: 11:15:46 up 17 days, 16:39, load average: 0.13, 0.11, 0.13 But as I'm the ath10k maintainer I'm biased :) -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k