From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@linaro.org (Kevin Hilman) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:36:00 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: hisi: rename hi3xxx to hisi In-Reply-To: (Olof Johansson's message of "Fri, 20 Dec 2013 08:50:26 -0800") References: <1387507978-4485-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> Message-ID: <87sitnh1bz.fsf@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Olof Johansson writes: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Haojian Zhuang > wrote: >> Since some new Hisilicon SoCs are not named as hi3xxx, rename mach-hi3xxx >> to mach-hisi instead. And the pronounciation of "hisi" is similar to the >> chinese pronounciation of Hisilicon. So Hisilicon guys like this name. >> >> ARCH_HI3xxx will be renamed later since other drivers are using it and >> they are still in linux-next git tree. So rename ARCH_HI3xxx later. >> > > Are you kidding me? We JUST merge your platform after a very painful > review with many fumbly cycles, and the very first thing you do is > rename it? > > I even complained about the crazy numbering and naming, and you didn't > fix it while we were in review, and now just days after we merge the > patches this one comes out? > > For now, we'll drop your original branch and fold in these patches > with the original ones. There's no point in checking in a platform > just to rename it, so we'll do the fixups. Agreed. I've dropped the hi3xxx/soc branch from next/soc and rebuild for-next without it. Kevin