From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37464) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9xPn-00056x-Ef for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:16:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9xPf-0006g2-To for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:16:35 -0400 Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.138]:59665) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9xPf-0006fs-OU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:16:27 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e8.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:16:27 +0100 Received: from d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (d01relay03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.235]) by d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86046E8040 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:16:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av05.pok.ibm.com (d01av05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.195]) by d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r7FDGODH166610 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:16:24 -0400 Received: from d01av05.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av05.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r7FDGNFS025190 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:16:24 -0400 From: Anthony Liguori In-Reply-To: <20130801081303.GA29450@lst.de> References: <1375251592-2537-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1375251592-2537-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20130801081303.GA29450@lst.de> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:16:19 -0500 Message-ID: <87siybqel8.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christoph Hellwig , Paolo Bonzini Cc: Kevin Wolf , Jeff Cody , Peter Lieven , Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , Luiz Capitulino Christoph Hellwig writes: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable >> to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying >> with a Signed-off-by line. > > The coded was intended to be GPLv2. Can you send a patch to add your copyright to this file? I added the BSD license that most folks Signed-off-by but you should add your GPLv2 copyright (making the file effectively GPLv2). Regards, Anthony Liguori