From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"for 1.6" <qemu-stable@nongnu.org>,
agraf@suse.de, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFT qom-cpu for-next] gdbstub: Fix gdb_register_coprocessor() register counting
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:53:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87siye9nbe.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376328163-7323-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de>
Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> writes:
> Commit a0e372f0c49ac01faeaeb73a6e8f50e8ac615f34 reorganized the register
> counting for GDB. While it seems correct not to let the total number of
> registers skyrocket in an SMP scenario through a static variable, the
> distinction between total register count and 'g' packet register count
> (last_reg vs. num_g_regs) got lost among the way.
>
> Fix this by introducing CPUState::gdb_num_g_regs and using that in
> gdb_handle_packet().
>
> Reported-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org (for 1.6)
> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Tested-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> gdbstub.c | 6 ++++--
> include/qom/cpu.h | 2 ++
> qom/cpu.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdbstub.c b/gdbstub.c
> index 1af25a6..9d067d6 100644
> --- a/gdbstub.c
> +++ b/gdbstub.c
> @@ -621,6 +621,8 @@ void gdb_register_coprocessor(CPUState *cpu,
> if (g_pos != s->base_reg) {
> fprintf(stderr, "Error: Bad gdb register numbering for '%s'\n"
> "Expected %d got %d\n", xml, g_pos, s->base_reg);
> + } else {
> + cpu->gdb_num_g_regs = cpu->gdb_num_regs;
> }
> }
> }
> @@ -902,7 +904,7 @@ static int gdb_handle_packet(GDBState *s, const char *line_buf)
> case 'g':
> cpu_synchronize_state(s->g_cpu);
> len = 0;
> - for (addr = 0; addr < s->g_cpu->gdb_num_regs; addr++) {
> + for (addr = 0; addr < s->g_cpu->gdb_num_g_regs; addr++) {
> reg_size = gdb_read_register(s->g_cpu, mem_buf + len, addr);
> len += reg_size;
> }
> @@ -914,7 +916,7 @@ static int gdb_handle_packet(GDBState *s, const char *line_buf)
> registers = mem_buf;
> len = strlen(p) / 2;
> hextomem((uint8_t *)registers, p, len);
> - for (addr = 0; addr < s->g_cpu->gdb_num_regs && len > 0; addr++) {
> + for (addr = 0; addr < s->g_cpu->gdb_num_g_regs && len > 0; addr++) {
> reg_size = gdb_write_register(s->g_cpu, registers, addr);
> len -= reg_size;
> registers += reg_size;
> diff --git a/include/qom/cpu.h b/include/qom/cpu.h
> index 0d6e95c..3e49936 100644
> --- a/include/qom/cpu.h
> +++ b/include/qom/cpu.h
> @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ struct kvm_run;
> * @current_tb: Currently executing TB.
> * @gdb_regs: Additional GDB registers.
> * @gdb_num_regs: Number of total registers accessible to GDB.
> + * @gdb_num_g_regs: Number of registers in GDB 'g' packets.
> * @next_cpu: Next CPU sharing TB cache.
> * @kvm_fd: vCPU file descriptor for KVM.
> *
> @@ -188,6 +189,7 @@ struct CPUState {
> struct TranslationBlock *current_tb;
> struct GDBRegisterState *gdb_regs;
> int gdb_num_regs;
> + int gdb_num_g_regs;
> CPUState *next_cpu;
>
> int kvm_fd;
> diff --git a/qom/cpu.c b/qom/cpu.c
> index aa95108..e71e57b 100644
> --- a/qom/cpu.c
> +++ b/qom/cpu.c
> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static void cpu_common_initfn(Object *obj)
> CPUState *cpu = CPU(obj);
> CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(obj);
>
> - cpu->gdb_num_regs = cc->gdb_num_core_regs;
> + cpu->gdb_num_regs = cpu->gdb_num_g_regs = cc->gdb_num_core_regs;
> }
>
> static int64_t cpu_common_get_arch_id(CPUState *cpu)
> --
> 1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-13 5:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-12 17:22 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFT qom-cpu for-next] gdbstub: Fix gdb_register_coprocessor() register counting Andreas Färber
2013-08-13 5:23 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2013-08-16 10:59 ` Andreas Färber
2013-08-16 13:21 ` Max Filippov
2013-08-16 16:34 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87siye9nbe.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.