Re: [PATCH 00/11] perf improvements past v1.7.10

[Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>]

Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:

> Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> writes:
>
>>   perf/aggregate: optionally include a t-test score
>
> By the way, have you heard about Dumbbench module on CPAN?  It is a
> module that attempts to implement reasonably robust benchmarking,
> trying to find and discard bad runs (outliers):
>
>   http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?Dumbbench
>
> It might be an easier solution (thanks to wonders of local::lib) than
> GNU R statistical package.

Thanks for that pointer, I'll look into it.  I'm less worried about
which particular package to use for the t-test (after all it's a pretty
well-known method and could also be hacked in directly), but from a
quick glance at the TOC they seem to have put a lot of thought into the
post-processing.

>>   perf: implement a test-selection feature
>>   perf: add a bisection tool
>
> It looks like those last two (10/11, 11/11) didn't made it to git
> mailing list, probably because of anti-spam size limits of email
> message on vger.

Oops, my bad.  It's not the filter but a 0 too many in my send-email
globs.  I sent them out, but for your merging convenience it's also at

  git://github.com/trast/git.git t/perf-gather-post-1.7.10

-- 
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch