From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 4/6] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Enable IO Wake up
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:37:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sjhsdk2y.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F4F1CBA.7040502@ti.com> (Rajendra Nayak's message of "Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:22:42 +0530")
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> writes:
> On Wednesday 29 February 2012 07:56 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
>> From: Vishwanath BS<vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
>>
>> Enable IO Wake up for OMAP3 as part of PM Init. Currently this has been
>> managed in cpuidle path which is not the right place. Subsequent patch
>> will remove IO Daisy chain handling in cpuidle path once daisy chain is
>> handled as part of hwmod mux.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vishwanath BS<vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
>> Tested-by: Govindraj.R<govindraj.raja@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo<t-kristo@ti.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
>> index e97ec3f..e6c2d39 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
>> @@ -793,6 +793,10 @@ static int __init omap3_pm_init(void)
>> goto err1;
>> }
>>
>> + if (omap3_has_io_wakeup())
>> + omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_MASK, WKUP_MOD,
>> + PM_WKEN);
>
> On OMAP4 this GLOBAL IO chain enable happens as part of the trigger
> function itself, it might make sense to do that for OMAP3 too to avoid
> similar issues as seen on OMAP4 when the GLOBAL switch is enabled too
> late in boot. The best however would be to get rid of it in the trigger
> function and enable this early during PM init, but I am not sure whats
> a good place to do this 'early' enough.
What about the subsys_initcall() that's already in the prm*.c files?
IMO, the global one-time init doesn't belong in the trigger function
because there's no need to do the extra PRM read/write when it should be
a one-shot init.
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 4/6] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Enable IO Wake up
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:37:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sjhsdk2y.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F4F1CBA.7040502@ti.com> (Rajendra Nayak's message of "Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:22:42 +0530")
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> writes:
> On Wednesday 29 February 2012 07:56 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
>> From: Vishwanath BS<vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
>>
>> Enable IO Wake up for OMAP3 as part of PM Init. Currently this has been
>> managed in cpuidle path which is not the right place. Subsequent patch
>> will remove IO Daisy chain handling in cpuidle path once daisy chain is
>> handled as part of hwmod mux.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vishwanath BS<vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
>> Tested-by: Govindraj.R<govindraj.raja@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo<t-kristo@ti.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
>> index e97ec3f..e6c2d39 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
>> @@ -793,6 +793,10 @@ static int __init omap3_pm_init(void)
>> goto err1;
>> }
>>
>> + if (omap3_has_io_wakeup())
>> + omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_MASK, WKUP_MOD,
>> + PM_WKEN);
>
> On OMAP4 this GLOBAL IO chain enable happens as part of the trigger
> function itself, it might make sense to do that for OMAP3 too to avoid
> similar issues as seen on OMAP4 when the GLOBAL switch is enabled too
> late in boot. The best however would be to get rid of it in the trigger
> function and enable this early during PM init, but I am not sure whats
> a good place to do this 'early' enough.
What about the subsys_initcall() that's already in the prm*.c files?
IMO, the global one-time init doesn't belong in the trigger function
because there's no need to do the extra PRM read/write when it should be
a one-shot init.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-01 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-29 14:26 [PATCHv3 0/6] ARM: OMAP3PLUS: IO daisychain support fixes Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:26 ` Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:26 ` [PATCHv3 1/6] ARM: OMAP3 PM: correct enable/disable of daisy io chain Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:26 ` Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:26 ` [PATCHv3 2/6] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Move IO Daisychain function to omap3 prm file Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:26 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-01 6:49 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-01 6:49 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-01 8:28 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-01 8:28 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-01 8:43 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-01 8:43 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-29 14:26 ` [PATCHv3 3/6] ARM: OMAP4 PM: Add IO Daisychain support Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:26 ` Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:26 ` [PATCHv3 4/6] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Enable IO Wake up Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:26 ` Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 17:22 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-02-29 17:22 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-01 6:52 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-01 6:52 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-01 8:25 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-01 8:25 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-01 22:37 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-03-01 22:37 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-02 9:19 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-02 9:19 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-02 9:23 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-02 9:23 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-29 14:27 ` [PATCHv3 5/6] ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO Daisychain support via hwmod mux Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:27 ` Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:27 ` [PATCHv3 6/6] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Remove IO Daisychain control from cpuidle Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 14:27 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-06 0:32 ` [PATCHv3 0/6] ARM: OMAP3PLUS: IO daisychain support fixes Kevin Hilman
2012-03-06 0:32 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sjhsdk2y.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=vishwanath.bs@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.