From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Weimer Subject: Re: Does recent 'smart' HTTP feature help git-svn thru unfriendly corp. firewalls too? Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 14:04:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87sk6544oc.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 06 14:25:05 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OA08U-00078A-3D for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 14:25:02 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752202Ab0EFMYz (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2010 08:24:55 -0400 Received: from ka.mail.enyo.de ([87.106.162.201]:44306 "EHLO ka.mail.enyo.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752156Ab0EFMYy (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2010 08:24:54 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1217 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 08:24:54 EDT Received: from [172.17.135.4] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by ka.mail.enyo.de with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1O9zoh-0001Zm-Vi for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 14:04:36 +0200 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O9zoh-00056c-OZ for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 14:04:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Michael Norman's message of "Wed, 5 May 2010 10:10:20 -0400") Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: * Michael Norman: > Subject line says it all - does it help? The Subversion folks work on a different HTTP-based protocol, which is supposed to be more proxy/cache-friendly (it's no longer WebDAV). Until that is deployed on servers, there is little Git can do to improve the situation.