From: Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: git branch -a now reports 'remotes/foo' rather than 'foo'?
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 12:16:43 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87skjcpeno.fsf@rimspace.net> (raw)
G'day. Debian recently released git 1.6.3 to unstable, so it has just
landed on my desk, and a change in the output of 'git branch' listings
is causing one of the front-ends I use to fail.
In previous versions, in a git-svn repository, I got this output to
'git branch -a':
,----[ git 1.6.2 and earlier ]
| ] git branch -a
| * master
| tags/16-1
| tags/18-1
| tags/19-2
| trunk
`----
Now, in 1.6.3, I see two different output formats:
,----[ git 1.6.3 ]
| ] git branch -a
| * master
| remotes/tags/16-1
| remotes/tags/18-1
| remotes/tags/19-2
| remotes/trunk
| ] git branch -r
| tags/16-1
| tags/18-1
| tags/19-2
| trunk
`----
The front-end I am using looks for a 'trunk' branch by name in the
output of 'git branch -a', which historically worked. Now, though, it
shows that fully qualified.
Looking at the release notes it looks like this was a deliberate change,
from this entry:
* "git-branch -r" shows HEAD symref that points at a remote branch in
interest of each tracked remote repository.
However, that isn't unambiguously clear about the change, and is pretty
light on the "why" parts. Worse, the only discussion I can find about
the change suggests that this was noticed, and there wasn't real clarity
about the background.
(See Jeff King under "[PATCH 1/2] add basic branch display tests" at [1]
for the details.)
I confess, to me, that having 'git branch -a' and 'git branch -r' emit
different values doesn't make much sense, but I suppose the upstream
code can be adapted.
I wanted to confirm that this was a deliberate change before I went to
the trouble or rewriting the front-end code however.
Regards,
Daniel
Footnotes:
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/110564/focus=110616
next reply other threads:[~2009-05-11 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-11 2:16 Daniel Pittman [this message]
2009-05-11 5:26 ` git branch -a now reports 'remotes/foo' rather than 'foo'? Jay Soffian
2009-05-11 7:01 ` Daniel Pittman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87skjcpeno.fsf@rimspace.net \
--to=daniel@rimspace.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.