From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1FaE8i-0002rO-6L for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:47:16 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FaE8g-0002qz-B7 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:47:14 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FaE8e-0002qn-P4 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:47:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FaE8e-0002qk-Kn for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:47:12 -0400 Received: from [194.109.24.26] (helo=smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FaECG-0000Sb-Id for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:50:56 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (249-174.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net [145.99.174.249]) by smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3UFlAGa048894 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:47:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mgerards@xs4all.nl) Mail-Copies-To: mgerards@xs4all.nl To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <200604301518.29064.okuji@enbug.org> From: Marco Gerards Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:49:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200604301518.29064.okuji@enbug.org> (Yoshinori K. Okuji's message of "Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:18:27 +0200") Message-ID: <87slnvgj2p.fsf@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: blklist.c X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:47:14 -0000 "Yoshinori K. Okuji" writes: > Here is a simple utility to display a block list based on the knowledge of > Linux's but not of GRUB's. I wrote this to aid the debugging of a filesystem. > The output format is similar to GRUB's block list, but not completely > identical (because GRUB always treats sectors instead of filesystem blocks). > If you think this is useful, I can put this code into GRUB. Perhaps we can turn it into a test program for automated testing? -- Marco