From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>,
Mark-yw Chen <mark-yw.chen@mediatek.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btmtksdio: fix infinite loop in btmtksdio_txrx_work()
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 15:27:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tsqyirsn.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGp9LzpBUReZtrTEKgUr-+yvB+3tcs5hw7ziC4WaMRFNa2AYpg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:52:31 +0200,
Sean Wang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 7:19 AM Sergey Senozhatsky
> <senozhatsky@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Every once in a while we see a hung btmtksdio_flush() task:
> >
> > INFO: task kworker/u17:0:189 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
> > __cancel_work_timer+0x3f4/0x460
> > cancel_work_sync+0x1c/0x2c
> > btmtksdio_flush+0x2c/0x40
> > hci_dev_open_sync+0x10c4/0x2190
> > [..]
> >
> > It all boils down to incorrect time_is_before_jiffies() usage in
> > btmtksdio_txrx_work(). The btmtksdio_txrx_work() loop is expected
> > to be terminated if running for longer than 5*HZ. However the
> > timeout check is twisted: time_is_before_jiffies(old_jiffies + 5*HZ)
> > evaluates to true when old_jiffies + 5*HZ is in the past i.e. when a
> > timeout has occurred. Using OR with time_is_before_jiffies(txrx_timeout)
> > means that:
> > - before the 5-second timeout: the condition is `int_status || false`,
> > so it loops as long as there are pending interrupts.
> > - after the 5-second timeout: the condition becomes `int_status || true`,
> > which is always true.
> >
> > When the loop becomes infinite btmtksdio_txrx_work() loop never
> > terminates and never releases the SDIO host.
> >
> > Fix loop termination condition to actually enforce a 5*HZ timeout.
> >
> > Fixes: 26270bc189ea4 ("Bluetooth: btmtksdio: move interrupt service to work")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/bluetooth/btmtksdio.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtksdio.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtksdio.c
> > index 5b0fab7b89b5..c6f80c419e90 100644
> > --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtksdio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtksdio.c
> > @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static void btmtksdio_txrx_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > if (btmtksdio_rx_packet(bdev, rx_size) < 0)
> > bdev->hdev->stat.err_rx++;
> > }
> > - } while (int_status || time_is_before_jiffies(txrx_timeout));
> > + } while (int_status && time_is_after_jiffies(txrx_timeout));
>
> yes, loop continues only while there is interrupt work and the timeout
> deadline is still in the future
I stumbled on this while backporting to distro kernels, and I wonder
whether this change is correct.
IIUC, this essentially makes the loop exiting right after the first
cycle; the patch changed from time_is_before_jiffies() to *_after_*(),
not only the logical OR to AND, and *_after_*() returns false, so the
whole condition becomes false, too.
thanks,
Takashi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-19 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 12:10 [PATCH] Bluetooth: btmtksdio: fix infinite loop in btmtksdio_txrx_work() Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-06-09 14:38 ` bluez.test.bot
2026-06-10 6:52 ` [PATCH] " Sean Wang
2026-06-19 13:27 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2026-06-19 14:20 ` Tomasz Figa
[not found] ` <CAAFQd5DyDQo9vBH80YYQBW7Bgf64F1m9q44-jhf1cc75XYpftA@mail.gmail.com>
2026-06-19 14:35 ` Takashi Iwai
2026-06-19 14:53 ` Tomasz Figa
2026-06-10 8:51 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-06-11 17:58 ` patchwork-bot+bluetooth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tsqyirsn.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=mark-yw.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=sean.wang@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.