Re: [PATCH 0/5] target/s390x: Forbid to use legacy ldst_phys() API

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Apr 14 2026, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 21/3/26 16:26, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 20/3/26 20:28, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>> On 3/19/26 2:51 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>> Replace legacy ld/st_phys() by address_space_ld/st()
>>>> then lock the target again further legacy API uses.
>>>>
>>>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (5):
>>>>    target/s390x: Replace legacy ld/st_phys -> address_space_ld/st (cpu)
>>>>    target/s390x: Replace legacy ld/st_phys -> address_space_ld/st (mmu)
>>>>    target/s390x: Replace legacy ld/st_phys -> address_space_ld/st (tcg)
>>>>    target/s390x: Replace legacy ld/st_phys -> address_space_ld/st (kvm)
>>>>    configs/targets: Restrict the legacy ldst_phys() API on s390x target
>>>
>>> For the series:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> For good measure I also ran some s390x kvm regression tests, took a 
>>> less comprehensive spin with a tcg s390x guest (on s390 host), and 
>>> forced a few of these codepaths as a sanity check.
>
> Does that mean we can also add:
>
>    Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
>
> ?

I was planning to pick this via s390-next, I can add T-b if desired.