From: Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com>
To: Primoz Fiser <primoz.fiser@norik.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>,
Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
"NXP i . MX U-Boot Team" <uboot-imx@nxp.com>,
Christoph Stoidner <c.stoidner@phytec.de>,
Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@phytec.de>,
u-boot@lists.denx.de, upstream@lists.phytec.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add Phytec i.MX93 support
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:04:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ttnavr5u.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9add814d-540b-4ddb-8cfc-261e62049d7e@norik.com> (Primoz Fiser's message of "Thu, 18 Jan 2024 11:47:52 +0100")
Hi,
Thanks for the review!
> s/imx93_phycore/phycore_imx93
>
> To fit into existing PHYTEC boards already in tree.
I deliberately picked that order so that it is aligned with most imx
boards already supported by u-boot.
The supported imx93 boards follow that pattern:
- imx93_var_som
- imx93_evk
So it felt natural to have:
- imx93_phycore
Plus the kernel device-trees are also following that order:
- imx93-phycore-xxx
On the other hand, it is true that the existing phycore boards use the
phytec_* pattern:
- phycore_am335x_r2
- phycore_imx8mm
- phycore_imx8mp
- phycore_rk3288/
So that will be confusing no matter the option that we choose.
I will come up with a v2 fixing your other remarks, but I think that
this should be addressed beforehand.
Thanks,
Mathieu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-18 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-17 7:52 [PATCH] Add Phytec i.MX93 support Mathieu Othacehe
2024-01-17 10:36 ` Fabio Estevam
2024-01-18 10:47 ` Primoz Fiser
2024-01-18 11:04 ` Mathieu Othacehe [this message]
2024-01-19 6:49 ` [Upstream] " Yannic Moog
2024-01-19 7:21 ` Yannic Moog
2024-01-24 13:30 ` Mathieu Othacehe
2024-01-24 13:46 ` Yannic Moog
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ttnavr5u.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=m.othacehe@gmail.com \
--cc=c.stoidner@phytec.de \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=primoz.fiser@norik.com \
--cc=sbabic@denx.de \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=uboot-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=upstream@lists.phytec.de \
--cc=w.egorov@phytec.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.