From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
To: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: memleak in libfs report
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 18:52:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ttqxxi0j.fsf@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4145D574-0969-4FF2-B5DA-B2170BED1772@oracle.com>
On Wed 11 Oct 2023 at 15:34, Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 11, 2023, at 11:15 AM, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Chuck,
>>
>> We have been getting memleaks in offset_ctx->xa in our networking tests:
>>
>> unreferenced object 0xffff8881004cd080 (size 576):
>> comm "systemd", pid 1, jiffies 4294893373 (age 1992.864s)
>> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>> 00 00 06 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
>> 38 5c 7c 02 81 88 ff ff 98 d0 4c 00 81 88 ff ff 8\|.......L.....
>> backtrace:
>> [<000000000f554608>] xas_alloc+0x306/0x430
>> [<0000000075537d52>] xas_create+0x4b4/0xc80
>> [<00000000a927aab2>] xas_store+0x73/0x1680
>> [<0000000020a61203>] __xa_alloc+0x1d8/0x2d0
>> [<00000000ae300af2>] __xa_alloc_cyclic+0xf1/0x310
>> [<000000001032332c>] simple_offset_add+0xd8/0x170
>> [<0000000073229fad>] shmem_mknod+0xbf/0x180
>> [<00000000242520ce>] vfs_mknod+0x3b0/0x5c0
>> [<000000001ef218dd>] unix_bind+0x2c2/0xdb0
>> [<0000000009b9a8dd>] __sys_bind+0x127/0x1e0
>> [<000000003c949fbb>] __x64_sys_bind+0x6e/0xb0
>> [<00000000b8a767c7>] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
>> [<000000006132ae0d>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
>>
>> It looks like those may be caused by recent commit 6faddda69f62 ("libfs:
>> Add directory operations for stable offsets")
>
> That sounds plausible.
>
>
>> but we don't have a proper
>> reproduction, just sometimes arbitrary getting the memleak complains
>> during/after the regression run.
>
> If the leak is a trickle rather than a flood, than can you take
> some time to see if you can narrow down a reproducer? If it's a
> flood, I can look at this immediately.
No, it is not a flood, we are not getting setups ran out of memory
during testing or anything. However, I don't have any good idea how to
narrow down the repro since as you can see from memleak trace it is a
result of some syscall performed by systemd and none of our tests do
anything more advanced with it than 'systemctl restart ovs-vswitchd'.
Basically it is a setup with Fedora and an upstream kernel that executes
bunch of network offload tests with Open vSwitch, iproute2 tc, Linux
bridge, etc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-11 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-11 15:15 memleak in libfs report Vlad Buslov
2023-10-11 15:34 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-10-11 15:52 ` Vlad Buslov [this message]
2023-10-11 16:06 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-10-22 23:28 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-10-23 7:07 ` Vlad Buslov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ttqxxi0j.fsf@nvidia.com \
--to=vladbu@nvidia.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.