Re: [PATCH] postcopy-ram: do not use qatomic_mb_read

[Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>]

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> It does not even pair with a qatomic_mb_set(), so it is clearer to use
> load-acquire in this case; they are synonyms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>

queued on my tree.

I guess this is for 8.1, right?

Later, Juan.

> ---
>  migration/postcopy-ram.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/postcopy-ram.c b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
> index 41c07136501a..23befd5ca8a2 100644
> --- a/migration/postcopy-ram.c
> +++ b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
> @@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ static PostcopyState incoming_postcopy_state;
>  
>  PostcopyState  postcopy_state_get(void)
>  {
> -    return qatomic_mb_read(&incoming_postcopy_state);
> +    return qatomic_load_acquire(&incoming_postcopy_state);
>  }
>  
>  /* Set the state and return the old state */