From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, petri.latvala@intel.com
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/1] lib/igt_device_scan: clear igt_devs.devs_scanned in igt_devices_free
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 08:59:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tu52ca09.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220915135739.3542117-2-riana.tauro@intel.com>
On Thu, 15 Sep 2022 06:57:39 -0700, Riana Tauro wrote:
>
Hi Riana,
> igt_devices_scan returns with empty list if devs_scanned
> is true and function is called after igt_devices_free
>
> clear igt_devs.devs_scanned in igt_devices_free.
The patch seems reasonable but could you please describe where you saw this
issue? It seems 'igt_devices_scan(true)' (called with force == true) will
get past this issue. Not too familiar with igt_devices_scan() usage so
copying some more people.
Also I am not sure why igt_devices_scan() doesn't simply do this:
void igt_devices_scan(bool force)
{
if (force && igt_devs.devs_scanned) {
igt_devices_free();
/* Not needed after this patch */
igt_devs.devs_scanned = false;
}
Thanks.
--
Ashutosh
>
> Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/igt_device_scan.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/igt_device_scan.c b/lib/igt_device_scan.c
> index eb6b45b8..e7c05d5c 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_device_scan.c
> +++ b/lib/igt_device_scan.c
> @@ -1030,6 +1030,7 @@ void igt_devices_free(void)
> igt_device_free(dev);
> free(dev);
> }
> + igt_devs.devs_scanned = false;
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-20 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-15 13:57 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/1] clear igt_devs.devs_scanned in igt_devices_free Riana Tauro
2022-09-15 13:57 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/1] lib/igt_device_scan: " Riana Tauro
2022-09-16 5:22 ` Tauro, Riana
2022-09-20 15:59 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2022-09-20 16:51 ` Tauro, Riana
2022-09-28 18:45 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2022-09-15 15:30 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2022-09-16 2:17 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tu52ca09.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=petri.latvala@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.