From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBDCC4320E for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 14:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816C66101D for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 14:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233724AbhHIOot (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 10:44:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48126 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234365AbhHIOoZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 10:44:25 -0400 Received: from agnus.defensec.nl (agnus.defensec.nl [IPv6:2001:985:d55d::711]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294D4C06179C for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 07:43:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brutus (brutus.lan [IPv6:2001:985:d55d::438]) by agnus.defensec.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 131212A006A; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 16:43:42 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 agnus.defensec.nl 131212A006A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=defensec.nl; s=default; t=1628520223; bh=J70/2DbtUEypuA5oXdkVz9/ZkXMbJKFm7knAqZas2So=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=SV2ol/yZeGc+uk55KrBfjaGXsasyejGT6oiEI+fHBOTs6gLrDxbLqzqG7U1lKDEm2 2p3e6DvZgZtj2Cgnu7SmxPV1mETl/zb0zdStEWpf1PbfXKaK7k3weOJKoL/6Ahz5ak o3kqVcr/M7biyhWteacmsJoq/jv8nCkaGrkiRgbQ= From: Dominick Grift To: James Carter Cc: Petr Lautrbach , SElinux list Subject: Re: lets think about 3.3 release References: <87fsvmu2xa.fsf@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 16:43:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: (James Carter's message of "Mon, 9 Aug 2021 10:01:10 -0400") Message-ID: <87tujy4r1g.fsf@defensec.nl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: selinux@vger.kernel.org James Carter writes: > On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 2:29 PM Petr Lautrbach wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I's about 184 commits and 5 months since the last release so I think >> it's time to slowly stop the development and start with 3.3 release >> candidates. >> >> According to patchwork, there are few patches in queue which need to be >> reviewed, or which were reviewed and some change for requested: >> >> * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11436955/ New [RFC] >> libsepol,secilc,policycoreutils: add unprivileged sandboxing >> capability >> * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11668455/ New selinux: make use of variables when defining libdir and includedir >> >> old, without any activity for a long time >> >> * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/12291637/ New [v2] checkpolicy: fix the leak memory when uses xperms >> >> changes requested >> >> * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/12372487/ New [v2] libselinux: add lock callbacks >> * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/12377593/ New libselinux/utils: drop requirement to combine compiling and linking >> >> no response yet >> >> * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/12420657/ New [userspace] libsepol/cil: remove obsolete comment >> >> acked, ready to be merged >> >> * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/12422971/ New mcstrans: Improve mlstrans-test output >> >> no response yet >> >> >> if I missed something please tell me. >> >> >> There's one issue opened on the mailing list >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/874kc57220.fsf@defensec.nl/T/#t - >> libsepol regressions >> > > I am working to address this and hope to have something out in the > next couple of days. I am also working on fixing some issues with the > line mark stuff in CIL. It would be nice to have both of these in the > next release, but I don't think they need to hold things up either. > Jim It's too soon for me to start worrying about this but: I don't care if my dssp5 policy breaks due to this regression (that is what it is) because other than me no one probably uses it, but I also maintain a policy for OpenWrt which relies on this functionality (or allowing duplicate blocks, macros) and I would not want to have this break there come 3.3. > >> If you agree and there's no obejction I can start with preparation and >> plan to release 3.3-rc1 on Wed Aug 18 2021 >> >> >> Petr >> -- gpg --locate-keys dominick.grift@defensec.nl Key fingerprint = FCD2 3660 5D6B 9D27 7FC6 E0FF DA7E 521F 10F6 4098 https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xDA7E521F10F64098 Dominick Grift