From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Anholt Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/5] drm/amdgpu: Add accounting of buffer object creation request via DRM cgroup Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 12:56:05 -0800 Message-ID: <87tvkb79ju.fsf@anholt.net> References: <20181120185814.13362-1-Kenny.Ho@amd.com> <20181120185814.13362-6-Kenny.Ho@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1375956667==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181120185814.13362-6-Kenny.Ho-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org> List-Id: Discussion list for AMD gfx List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: amd-gfx-bounces-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org Sender: "amd-gfx" To: Kenny Ho , y2kenny-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.orgKenny.Ho-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org, amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org, intel-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org --===============1375956667== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Kenny Ho writes: > Account for the total size of buffer object requested to amdgpu by > buffer type on a per cgroup basis. > > x prefix in the control file name x.bo_requested.amd.stat signify > experimental. Why is a counting of the size of buffer objects ever allocated useful, as opposed to the current size of buffer objects allocated? And, really, why is this stat in cgroups, instead of a debugfs entry? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE/JuuFDWp9/ZkuCBXtdYpNtH8nugFAlv0dOUACgkQtdYpNtH8 nujhhw//bXx9tdGEAxnvdNW7OssdWk6uZvqc2P8EwZaraQonObSIawTmaK8Iw/He ebILvlcxf0jadJWcB70G3k1m1yRW/GS6d990HZ8+fzu0sNDHh2pXW7Rre+wIaDgf 69f29x6kz0VlhscY5SwSMBnfIhR+/v/8xZtQ+QGZnGLt4MpRDFympm95GhzrB9fC bs6VSe1gJDYs/vcEK0IIrymCG3NjvTni8uY/UQPJKr8LxO6e+Nj3k41zUGg5F6U+ 49BFB0gzXnBf9M3BRVCj9APxEhWuRifmiHz50aH6bgIXpmhvzh0MfgnEkkzZbRzq ClM2jUmKzaYBhnTQvLEwTEYjd4mw1p2a7nCZhQKm6u3hZGmzyjPmxXOD/noOybBm HnZ/km+eNE60ge+rjVG9ewloa8gPjozZGc4zUUE6tmmveV659RbgNXocZrfcVGuU 1cth0VOdslAV9Mw6TtUGUqGzTsEfxUtISWVznZX0kjfeiOQLrZsJ3m146hDUIqod 4RSt75LQyR0yXvtdvOh2AlImSvLpOEgXQnaMywgBSIpVSpV25YMlYxKNaedN8GU/ kowMGmmgP9rki+215pXjELZWYsq8bBOwQ7bMu07LYz138cHuX9VdukgXdFq1x268 J1+AYDlrOce8Xdgy5hwfzIcwcs8hjHk8PmBhWwsT8bhnrWQrY04= =TyVf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --===============1375956667== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KYW1kLWdmeCBt YWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKYW1kLWdmeEBsaXN0cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0cy5m cmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9hbWQtZ2Z4Cg== --===============1375956667==-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Anholt Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/5] drm/amdgpu: Add accounting of buffer object creation request via DRM cgroup Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 12:56:05 -0800 Message-ID: <87tvkb79ju.fsf@anholt.net> References: <20181120185814.13362-1-Kenny.Ho@amd.com> <20181120185814.13362-6-Kenny.Ho@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1375956667==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181120185814.13362-6-Kenny.Ho-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: amd-gfx-bounces-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org Sender: "amd-gfx" To: Kenny Ho , y2kenny-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, Kenny.Ho-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org, amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org, intel-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org --===============1375956667== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Kenny Ho writes: > Account for the total size of buffer object requested to amdgpu by > buffer type on a per cgroup basis. > > x prefix in the control file name x.bo_requested.amd.stat signify > experimental. Why is a counting of the size of buffer objects ever allocated useful, as opposed to the current size of buffer objects allocated? And, really, why is this stat in cgroups, instead of a debugfs entry? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE/JuuFDWp9/ZkuCBXtdYpNtH8nugFAlv0dOUACgkQtdYpNtH8 nujhhw//bXx9tdGEAxnvdNW7OssdWk6uZvqc2P8EwZaraQonObSIawTmaK8Iw/He ebILvlcxf0jadJWcB70G3k1m1yRW/GS6d990HZ8+fzu0sNDHh2pXW7Rre+wIaDgf 69f29x6kz0VlhscY5SwSMBnfIhR+/v/8xZtQ+QGZnGLt4MpRDFympm95GhzrB9fC bs6VSe1gJDYs/vcEK0IIrymCG3NjvTni8uY/UQPJKr8LxO6e+Nj3k41zUGg5F6U+ 49BFB0gzXnBf9M3BRVCj9APxEhWuRifmiHz50aH6bgIXpmhvzh0MfgnEkkzZbRzq ClM2jUmKzaYBhnTQvLEwTEYjd4mw1p2a7nCZhQKm6u3hZGmzyjPmxXOD/noOybBm HnZ/km+eNE60ge+rjVG9ewloa8gPjozZGc4zUUE6tmmveV659RbgNXocZrfcVGuU 1cth0VOdslAV9Mw6TtUGUqGzTsEfxUtISWVznZX0kjfeiOQLrZsJ3m146hDUIqod 4RSt75LQyR0yXvtdvOh2AlImSvLpOEgXQnaMywgBSIpVSpV25YMlYxKNaedN8GU/ kowMGmmgP9rki+215pXjELZWYsq8bBOwQ7bMu07LYz138cHuX9VdukgXdFq1x268 J1+AYDlrOce8Xdgy5hwfzIcwcs8hjHk8PmBhWwsT8bhnrWQrY04= =TyVf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --===============1375956667== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KYW1kLWdmeCBt YWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKYW1kLWdmeEBsaXN0cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0cy5m cmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9hbWQtZ2Z4Cg== --===============1375956667==--