Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/4] linux-user/nios2: bump min uname to 4.16.0 [!HACK]

["Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>]

Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> writes:

> On 09/11/2018 04:14 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Le 11/09/2018 à 16:06, Alex Bennée a écrit:
>>> This is to work around the limitations of the buildroot
>>> qemu_nios2_10m50_defconfig which sets the base kernel version for
>>> glibc.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>  linux-user/nios2/target_syscall.h | 2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/linux-user/nios2/target_syscall.h b/linux-user/nios2/target_syscall.h
>>> index ca6b7e69f6..905b80d112 100644
>>> --- a/linux-user/nios2/target_syscall.h
>>> +++ b/linux-user/nios2/target_syscall.h
>>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>>>  #define TARGET_SYSCALL_H
>>>
>>>  #define UNAME_MACHINE "nios2"
>>> -#define UNAME_MINIMUM_RELEASE "3.19.0"
>>> +#define UNAME_MINIMUM_RELEASE "4.16.0"
>>>
>>>  struct target_pt_regs {
>>>      unsigned long  r8;    /* r8-r15 Caller-saved GP registers */
>>>
>>
>> I have no objection. Perhaps you could ask NiosII Maintainers (cc).
>
> If that's needed, so be it. The Linux 3.19 was required because some
> obscure ABI change happened at that point.

I don't think so - it's an artefact of the way the buildroot toolchain
is built. But the real question which I address in the cover letter is
does nios2-linux-user get much use? I tried enabled tests/tcg for it and
it fails rather badly.

--
Alex Bennée