All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org>
To: fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@virtuozzo.com>,
	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [fuse] writeback cache triggers read() for O_WRONLY files - bug?
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 20:47:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tw1nuq49.fsf@vostro.rath.org> (raw)

Hello,

When enabling writeback cache for SSHFS, appending to files overwrites
data at a different position (cf. https://github.com/libfuse/sshfs/issues/72).

When trying to track this issue down, I noticed that the libfuse
passthrough_ll example also has problems with appending: calling
fuse_reply_data gives a "Bad File Descriptior" error.

This in turn I traced this down to the fact that when writeback caching
is enabled, and userspace calls open(name, O_WRONLY|O_APPEND) the kernel
passes the O_WRONLY flag on to libfuse. But when userspace then writes
data, the kernel issues a read() request to libfuse (presumably to fill
the write cache) - for a file that has been opened write-only.

In the passthrough_ll example, this then fails because the underlying
file has also been opened O_WRONLY and the strace read then fails.

I am not sure what to make of this. Is this behavior of the kernel
correct? Should libfuse be prepared to accept READ requests for files
that have been opened write-only? Or should the kernel never open files
write-only when writeback caching is enabled?

(I am not sure if something like this is also the cause of the
dataloss problem in SSHFS, but it seems worth addressing in any case)

Thanks,
-Nikolaus

-- 
GPG Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F

             »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«

             reply	other threads:[~2017-08-04 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-04 18:47 Nikolaus Rath [this message]
2017-08-04 19:00 ` [fuse] writeback cache triggers read() for O_WRONLY files - bug? Nikolaus Rath
2017-08-04 19:04   ` Maxim Patlasov
2017-08-04 19:13     ` Nikolaus Rath
2017-08-05  0:11       ` Maxim Patlasov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tw1nuq49.fsf@vostro.rath.org \
    --to=nikolaus@rath.org \
    --cc=fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatlasov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.