All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [sched/idle] bb400b924e: fio.write_clat_95%_us -8% improvement
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 14:58:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tw60900m.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <070BEF4AC20468458C22969097656CD94BFB570E@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 728 bytes --]

"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@intel.com> writes:

>> > Should I add my task again after the commit is available or just wait?
>> 
>> I think it is better for you to queue the task again.  There is another hole in
>> queue implementation.  Your original queue should not succeed.
>> Philip is working on that.
>> 
>
> Then I need to ask again, the same task are scheduled several times, how are their
> reports handled? The newest one overwrites the old one? or all of the reports are
> kept by the timestamp?

All test results will be kept.  You can add "debug-setup: xxx" in job
file to distinguish between that so that they will be put in different
result root.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

> Thanks,
> -Aubrey

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-07  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-05  7:12 [lkp-robot] [sched/idle] bb400b924e: fio.write_clat_95%_us -8% improvement kernel test robot
2017-04-06  5:56 ` Li, Aubrey
2017-04-06  6:26   ` Ye Xiaolong
2017-04-06 13:54     ` Li, Aubrey
2017-04-07  1:33       ` Huang, Ying
2017-04-07  1:47         ` Li, Aubrey
2017-04-07  2:21           ` Huang, Ying
2017-04-07  3:10             ` Li, Aubrey
2017-04-07  1:46       ` Ye Xiaolong
2017-04-07  2:12         ` Li, Aubrey
2017-04-07  2:24           ` Huang, Ying
2017-04-07  5:26             ` Li, Aubrey
2017-04-07  6:02               ` Huang, Ying
2017-04-07  6:06                 ` Li, Aubrey
2017-04-07  6:11                   ` Ye Xiaolong
2017-04-07  6:16                     ` Li, Aubrey
2017-04-07  6:25                       ` Huang, Ying
2017-04-07  6:41                         ` Li, Aubrey
2017-04-07  6:44                           ` Huang, Ying
2017-04-07  6:51                             ` Li, Aubrey
2017-04-07  6:58                               ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2017-04-07  6:12                   ` Huang, Ying
2017-04-07  3:34         ` Li, Aubrey
2017-04-07  3:44           ` Ye Xiaolong
2017-04-07  6:58         ` Li, Aubrey
2017-04-07  7:03           ` Huang, Ying
2017-04-07  7:12             ` Li, Aubrey
2017-04-07  7:18               ` Huang, Ying
2017-04-07  8:32               ` Du, Julie
2017-04-07  8:39                 ` Li, Aubrey
2017-04-07  8:43                   ` Huang, Ying
2017-04-07  8:48                     ` Li, Aubrey
2017-04-07  8:53                     ` Li, Aubrey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tw60900m.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.