From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:44:11 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] Future of linphone package,
	was: Re: [PATCH/next 2/4] DEVELOPERS: add initial list of Buildroot
	developers
In-Reply-To: <408dea4c-03d3-9f30-9235-5ebcc721f58b@mind.be> (Arnout
 Vandecappelle's message of "Wed, 24 Aug 2016 02:23:18 +0200")
References: <1471902678-18693-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
 <1471902678-18693-3-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
 <670f6e5c-e513-6b3f-ed82-4da1ddc3d141@lucaceresoli.net>
 <20160823134138.6f9818ef@free-electrons.com>
 <f8fu8dx2gc.ln2@ID-313208.user.individual.net>
 <20160823215041.358d2e66@free-electrons.com>
 <87h9abjjeq.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
 <408dea4c-03d3-9f30-9235-5ebcc721f58b@mind.be>
Message-ID: <87tweahar8.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

>>>>> "Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> writes:

Hi,

 >> > What do you think?
 >> 
 >> If nobody cares about it, yes - Then I think we should deprecate it.

 >  I say, leave it alone unless there are some annoying autobuild failures. There
 > are hundreds of packages that nobody cares about, are we going to deprecate them
 > all?

Yeah, as long as it is not causing issues I'm fine with keeping it.

-- 
Venlig hilsen,
Peter Korsgaard