From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/16] staging/lustre: fix up obsolete cpu function usage.
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 10:09:07 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87twy3j7fo.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74B1B5A4-D3CE-4A7A-A09B-6B755623ADA4@linuxhacker.ru>
Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> writes:
> Thanks!
> Seems there was a midair collsion with my own patch that was not as comprehensive
> wrt functions touched: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/2/10
Yep, I posted this for completeness (and for your reference), but
figured you'd handle it.
> But on the other hand I also tried to clean up
> some of the NR_CPUS usage while I was at it and this raises
> this question, from me, in the code like:
>
> for_each_cpu_mask(i, blah) {
> blah
> if (something)
> break;
> }
> if (i == NR_CPUS)
> blah;
>
> when we are replacing for_each_cpu_mask with for_each_cpu,
> what do we check the counter against now to see that the entire loop was executed
> and we did not exit prematurely? nr_cpu_ids?
You want >= nr_cpu_ids here.
> Also I assume we still want to get rid of direct cpumask assignments like
>> mask = *cpumask_of_node(cpu_to_node(index));
Yes, but this code is wrong anyway:
mask = *cpumask_of_node(cpu_to_node(index));
for (i = max; i < num_online_cpus(); i++)
cpumask_clear_cpu(i, &mask);
*Never* iterate to num_online_cpus(). eg. if cpus 0 and 3 are online,
num_online_cpus() == 2. I'm not sure what this code is doing, but it's
not doing it well :)
There are several issues here. You need to handle cpus going offline
(during this routine, as well as after). You need to use a
cpumask_var_t, like so:
cpumask_var_t mask;
...
case PDB_POLICY_NEIGHBOR:
if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_???)) {
rc = -ENOMEM;
break;
}
...
Or get rid of the mask altogether, eg:
pc->pc_npartners = -1;
for_each_cpu(i, cpu_online_mask) {
if (i < max)
pc->pc_npartners++;
}
...
pidx = 0;
for_each_cpu(i, cpu_online_mask) {
if (i >= max)
break;
ppc = &ptlrpcds->pd_threads[i];
pc->pc_partners[pidx++] = ppc;
ppc->pc_partners[ppc->pc_npartners++] = pc;
}
[ This is off the top of my head, no idea if it's right...]
Thanks,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-02 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-02 11:35 [PATCH 01/16] CONFIG_DISABLE_OBSOLETE_CPUMASK_FUNCTIONS: set if CPUMASK_OFFSTACK Rusty Russell
2015-03-02 11:35 ` [PATCH 02/16] cpumask: fix cpu-hotplug documentation Rusty Russell
2015-03-02 11:35 ` [PATCH 03/16] ia64: Use for_each_cpu_and() and cpumask_any_and() instead of temp var Rusty Russell
2015-03-02 11:47 ` Rusty Russell
2015-03-02 11:35 ` [PATCH 04/16] drivers: fix up obsolete cpu function usage Rusty Russell
2015-03-02 22:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-02 11:35 ` [PATCH 05/16] staging/lustre: " Rusty Russell
2015-03-02 17:50 ` Oleg Drokin
2015-03-02 23:39 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2015-03-03 1:16 ` Oleg Drokin
2015-03-03 3:12 ` Rusty Russell
2015-03-02 11:35 ` [PATCH 06/16] ia64: " Rusty Russell
2015-03-02 11:47 ` Rusty Russell
2015-05-26 20:45 ` Tony Luck
2015-05-26 20:45 ` Tony Luck
2015-05-27 1:18 ` Rusty Russell
2015-05-27 1:30 ` Rusty Russell
2015-05-27 17:37 ` Tony Luck
2015-05-27 17:37 ` Tony Luck
2015-05-28 3:44 ` Rusty Russell
2015-05-28 3:56 ` Rusty Russell
2015-03-02 11:35 ` [uml-devel] [PATCH 07/16] um: " Rusty Russell
2015-03-02 11:35 ` Rusty Russell
2015-03-02 11:35 ` [PATCH 08/16] x86: " Rusty Russell
2015-03-02 13:36 ` [tip:x86/cleanups] x86: Fix up obsolete __cpu_set() " tip-bot for Rusty Russell
2015-03-02 11:35 ` [PATCH 09/16] mips: fix up obsolete cpu " Rusty Russell
2015-03-02 12:34 ` [PATCH 01/16] CONFIG_DISABLE_OBSOLETE_CPUMASK_FUNCTIONS: set if CPUMASK_OFFSTACK Paul Bolle
2015-03-02 23:40 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87twy3j7fo.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=green@linuxhacker.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.