From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mmc: tmio/SDHI fixup patches Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:45:35 -0500 Message-ID: <87txee6dvk.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> References: <87iovn8ohs.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87iovn8ohs.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> (Kuninori Morimoto's message of "Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:30:03 -0800 (PST)") Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kuninori Morimoto Cc: Simon , Magnus , Linux-SH , Kuninori Morimoto , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Hi Kuninori, On Wed, Nov 20 2013, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > Hi Chris > > Now, our new board would like to use sh_mobile_sdhi driver, > then, it is expecting sh_mobile_sdhi use regulator. > But, this regulator is based on GPIO driver, > and GPIO driver probe timing is after sh_mobile_sdhi. > So, sh_mobile_sdhi (= tmio_mmc_pio) use default ocr_avail, > and it doesn't work for us. > #1 patch returns -EPROBE_DEFER in such case. > it changes tmio_mmc_host_probe() behavior, but > in my check, tmio_mmc_pio driver user is sh_mobile_sdhi/tmio-mmc only, > and, current user has no conflict by this patch. > > sh_mobile_sdhi/tmio-mmc is very similar, but, have some difference. > #2 - #4 cares such case. > > These were part of "SDHI support for r8a7790" patch set, > but was separated Sorry for the delay, I've pushed all four patches to mmc-next for 3.14. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 01:45:35 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mmc: tmio/SDHI fixup patches Message-Id: <87txee6dvk.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> List-Id: References: <87iovn8ohs.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> In-Reply-To: <87iovn8ohs.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> (Kuninori Morimoto's message of "Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:30:03 -0800 (PST)") MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Kuninori Morimoto Cc: Simon , Magnus , Linux-SH , Kuninori Morimoto , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Hi Kuninori, On Wed, Nov 20 2013, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > Hi Chris > > Now, our new board would like to use sh_mobile_sdhi driver, > then, it is expecting sh_mobile_sdhi use regulator. > But, this regulator is based on GPIO driver, > and GPIO driver probe timing is after sh_mobile_sdhi. > So, sh_mobile_sdhi (= tmio_mmc_pio) use default ocr_avail, > and it doesn't work for us. > #1 patch returns -EPROBE_DEFER in such case. > it changes tmio_mmc_host_probe() behavior, but > in my check, tmio_mmc_pio driver user is sh_mobile_sdhi/tmio-mmc only, > and, current user has no conflict by this patch. > > sh_mobile_sdhi/tmio-mmc is very similar, but, have some difference. > #2 - #4 cares such case. > > These were part of "SDHI support for r8a7790" patch set, > but was separated Sorry for the delay, I've pushed all four patches to mmc-next for 3.14. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball