From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45493)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@redhat.com>) id 1Vkqan-0001wB-BH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 02:28:31 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@redhat.com>) id 1Vkqah-00054V-4G
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 02:28:25 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4580)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@redhat.com>) id 1Vkqag-000549-SL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 02:28:19 -0500
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
References: <1385001528-12003-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
	<1385001528-12003-14-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
	<20131121094202.GB3140@redhat.com>
	<20131121152137.6348e9b2@nial.usersys.redhat.com>
	<20131121143847.GA11741@redhat.com>
	<20131122181446.4891e953@nial.usersys.redhat.com>
	<20131124105857.GA864@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:27:55 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20131124105857.GA864@redhat.com> (Michael S. Tsirkin's message
	of "Sun, 24 Nov 2013 12:58:57 +0200")
Message-ID: <87txf1kkjo.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 13/27] acpi: memory hotplug ACPI hardware
	implementation
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, aliguori@amazon.com, stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, hutao@cn.fujitsu.com, marcel.a@redhat.com, mjt@tls.msk.ru, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com, quintela@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>, lcapitulino@redhat.com, chegu_vinod@hp.com, afaerber@suse.de

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:

[...]
> Here this made me think of the following question:
> should not memory available on boot be listed in CMOS?
> Let's assume new BIOS gets interrupt telling it there's new memory.
> It clears the interrupt and then system is reset.
>
> Will system after reset detect the new hotplugged memory?
> How?

Do physical systems with hot-pluggable memory exist?  How do they
behave?

[...]