From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@linaro.org (Kevin Hilman) Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 13:20:16 -0700 Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: mvebu: soc changes for v3.13 In-Reply-To: <20131008155440.GI5402@titan.lakedaemon.net> (Jason Cooper's message of "Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:54:40 -0400") References: <20130930154208.GG31178@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20131007170640.GF15413@quad.lixom.net> <20131008155440.GI5402@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <87txgqtcvz.fsf@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Jason Cooper writes: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:06:40AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:42:08AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: >> > Guys, >> > >> > These are the SoC changes that didn't make it during the last merge >> > window. As with mvebu/drivers, these have been in -next since 3.12-rc1 >> > without issue. >> >> I should have looked closer at this before I commented on the PCI branch. >> >> > Sebastian Hesselbarth (2): >> > ARM: dove: switch to DT probed mbus address windows >> > ARM: dove: remove legacy pcie and clock init >> >> It looks to me like this second patch will need to be based on the PCI branch, >> or you will have broken PCI if this is applied and not the drivers/pci patches, >> right? If so, you need to base this branch on top of the other one, not send >> them separately -- otherwise a git bisect that lands between these two will >> result in a non-booting kernel. > > I've moved both patches over to mvebu/drivers. This leaves one patch in > mvebu/soc. I'll hold off on the pull request for it until I have some > more (looks like there's some stuff pending). OK, ignoring the soc branch for now. Kevin