From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] qemu: use virtio linux headers in portable code
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 19:55:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87txlp1bsy.fsf@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130526214213.GB4828@redhat.com>
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 03:49:53PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > Il 26/05/2013 22:02, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>> >> > My fault. I should have looked at linux/types.h (actually asm-generic/).
>> >>
>> >> Not really, __uX appear in the headers that were posted.
>>
>> Which is a problem because this is a reserved namespace in C99.
>>
>> >> What I'm saying is - a chance of a conflict is very remote,
>> >> if it happens it's a build failure so easy to debug.
>> >
>> > I'm sure that others will complain, :) but you can go ahead.
>>
>> I think we should clean up the virtio headers in the kernel first.
>> Seems like a good thing to do given the standardization effort too.
>> There are lots of headers in uapi that use the C99 int types
>
> I found 4:
> $ grep -l uint include/uapi/linux/*h
> include/uapi/linux/dm-log-userspace.h
> include/uapi/linux/fuse.h
> include/uapi/linux/jffs2.h
> include/uapi/linux/pps.h
> include/uapi/linux/rds.h
> include/uapi/linux/sctp.h
>
> That's not really lots.
>
>> so there
>> doesn't seem to be a reason they couldn't be used in virtio. fuse.h
>> even has a:
>>
>> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>> #include <linux/types.h>
>> #else
>> #include <stdint.h>
>> #endif
>>
>> Which seems like a reasonable thing to do.
>
> In kernel, we really want to use things like endian-ness
> checks (and, we really should have them in userspace too!).
> So we want __le32 and other kernel goodies
> like that. stdint.h won't cut it.
With the spec being standardized, I think having a stand alone set of
headers is a good thing. Licensing is problematic here too.
If virtio headers depend on other Linux headers, then it really doesn't
matter if they are BSD licensed if you need a GPL header (like
linux/if_ether.h).
Now, we can certainly debate the copyrightability of these defines and
what have you but if the headers are meant to be 1) consumed outside the
kernel 2) licensed under a different license than the general kernel
then depending on kernel goodies is the wrong strategy.
>> The only other kernel dependency is linux/if_ether.h to define
>> ETH_ALEN. But it seems completely reasonable to define a
>> VIRTIO_NET_MAC_ALEN or something like that.
>
> Ugh. Not really reasonable IMO. We also use ETH_P_IP in code,
> would like to get rid of redefining that too.
> But we can have our own linux/if_ether.h for non-linux hosts,
> just with a
> couple of macros like that, it's not a big deal.
See above.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
>> This would make the virtio headers completely stand alone and includable
>> in userspace (without violating C99).
>>
>> Perhaps it's even worth moving the headers from uapi/linux to
>> uapi/virtio. Rusty, what do you think?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Anhtony Liguori
>>
>> >
>> > Paolo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] qemu: use virtio linux headers in portable code
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 19:55:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87txlp1bsy.fsf@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130526214213.GB4828@redhat.com>
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 03:49:53PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > Il 26/05/2013 22:02, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>> >> > My fault. I should have looked at linux/types.h (actually asm-generic/).
>> >>
>> >> Not really, __uX appear in the headers that were posted.
>>
>> Which is a problem because this is a reserved namespace in C99.
>>
>> >> What I'm saying is - a chance of a conflict is very remote,
>> >> if it happens it's a build failure so easy to debug.
>> >
>> > I'm sure that others will complain, :) but you can go ahead.
>>
>> I think we should clean up the virtio headers in the kernel first.
>> Seems like a good thing to do given the standardization effort too.
>> There are lots of headers in uapi that use the C99 int types
>
> I found 4:
> $ grep -l uint include/uapi/linux/*h
> include/uapi/linux/dm-log-userspace.h
> include/uapi/linux/fuse.h
> include/uapi/linux/jffs2.h
> include/uapi/linux/pps.h
> include/uapi/linux/rds.h
> include/uapi/linux/sctp.h
>
> That's not really lots.
>
>> so there
>> doesn't seem to be a reason they couldn't be used in virtio. fuse.h
>> even has a:
>>
>> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>> #include <linux/types.h>
>> #else
>> #include <stdint.h>
>> #endif
>>
>> Which seems like a reasonable thing to do.
>
> In kernel, we really want to use things like endian-ness
> checks (and, we really should have them in userspace too!).
> So we want __le32 and other kernel goodies
> like that. stdint.h won't cut it.
With the spec being standardized, I think having a stand alone set of
headers is a good thing. Licensing is problematic here too.
If virtio headers depend on other Linux headers, then it really doesn't
matter if they are BSD licensed if you need a GPL header (like
linux/if_ether.h).
Now, we can certainly debate the copyrightability of these defines and
what have you but if the headers are meant to be 1) consumed outside the
kernel 2) licensed under a different license than the general kernel
then depending on kernel goodies is the wrong strategy.
>> The only other kernel dependency is linux/if_ether.h to define
>> ETH_ALEN. But it seems completely reasonable to define a
>> VIRTIO_NET_MAC_ALEN or something like that.
>
> Ugh. Not really reasonable IMO. We also use ETH_P_IP in code,
> would like to get rid of redefining that too.
> But we can have our own linux/if_ether.h for non-linux hosts,
> just with a
> couple of macros like that, it's not a big deal.
See above.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
>> This would make the virtio headers completely stand alone and includable
>> in userspace (without violating C99).
>>
>> Perhaps it's even worth moving the headers from uapi/linux to
>> uapi/virtio. Rusty, what do you think?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Anhtony Liguori
>>
>> >
>> > Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-27 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-26 15:22 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] qemu: use virtio linux headers in portable code Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-26 15:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/11] make: pull in linux-headers on all platforms Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-26 15:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 02/11] scripts/update-linux-headers.sh: add virtio Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-26 15:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 03/11] virtio-9p: switch to linux-headers Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-26 15:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 04/11] virtio-net, eth: use linux-headers Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-26 15:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 05/11] virtio-blk: switch to linux-headers Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-26 15:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 06/11] virtio-balloon: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-26 15:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 07/11] virtio-rng: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-26 15:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 08/11] virtio-console: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-26 15:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 09/11] virtio: add virtio_ids from linux-headers Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-26 15:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 10/11] virtio-pci: switch to linux-headers Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-26 15:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/11] virtio: use ring structure from linux-headers Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-26 15:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] qemu: use virtio linux headers in portable code Peter Maydell
2013-05-26 17:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-26 18:00 ` Peter Maydell
2013-05-26 18:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-26 18:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-26 18:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-26 18:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-26 20:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-26 20:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-26 20:49 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-05-26 20:49 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-05-26 21:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-26 21:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-27 0:55 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2013-05-27 0:55 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-05-27 15:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-27 15:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-27 16:14 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-05-27 16:14 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-05-28 6:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-28 6:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-29 0:14 ` Rusty Russell
2013-05-29 13:05 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-05-29 14:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-29 14:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-29 14:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-05-29 14:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-05-27 11:15 ` Rusty Russell
2013-05-28 2:55 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-05-29 0:17 ` Rusty Russell
2013-05-29 0:17 ` Rusty Russell
2013-05-29 5:17 ` Bryan Venteicher
2013-05-29 5:17 ` Bryan Venteicher
2013-05-27 10:19 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87txlp1bsy.fsf@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.