From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:50:58 +0300
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath10k: fix HW version/revision names
In-Reply-To: <20849.6.460024.549288@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (Sujith Manoharan's
	message of "Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:57:50 +0530")
References: <1366354203-24028-1-git-send-email-bartosz.markowski@tieto.com>
	<5170FA8A.5010001@tieto.com>
	<20849.6.460024.549288@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Message-ID: <87txmzj6dp.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

Sujith Manoharan <sujith@msujith.org> writes:

> Michal Kazior wrote:
>> >   static const struct ath10k_hw_params ath10k_hw_params_list[] = {
>> >   	{
>> >   		.id = AR9888_HW_1_0_VERSION,
>> > -		.name = "ar9888 rev1 (build 44)",
>> > +		.name = "qca9880 hw1.0",
>> 
>> Is it 9888 or is it 9880?
>
> Both actually. QCA9888 is the chip part for the computing cards
> and QCA9880 is for Access Points.
>
> Maybe we can have QCA988x.

Yeah, qca988x is a good choise.

-- 
Kalle Valo