From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: greened@obbligato.org (David A. Greene) Subject: Re: git-subtree Ready #2 Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:00:37 -0600 Message-ID: <87ty2ft0tm.fsf@smith.obbligato.org> References: <877gztmfwy.fsf@smith.obbligato.org> <8739acra5j.fsf@smith.obbligato.org> <20120215050855.GB29902@sigill.intra.peff.net> <87sjicpsr1.fsf@smith.obbligato.org> <87ty2ro1zf.fsf@smith.obbligato.org> <20120220205346.GA6335@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vd399jdwc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vobsox84l.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <87hayfv75y.fsf@smith.obbligato.org> <7vy5rrfft2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avery Pennarun , Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Feb 25 16:04:16 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S1JAW-0005vj-Bx for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 16:04:16 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756715Ab2BYPDn (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:03:43 -0500 Received: from li209-253.members.linode.com ([173.255.199.253]:51856 "EHLO johnson.obbligato.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756697Ab2BYPDm (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:03:42 -0500 Received: from c-75-73-20-8.hsd1.mn.comcast.net ([75.73.20.8] helo=smith.obbligato.org) by johnson.obbligato.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1S1JAL-0004XB-6E; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:04:05 -0600 In-Reply-To: <7vy5rrfft2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sat, 25 Feb 2012 01:00:41 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Filter-Spam-Score: () X-Filter-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "johnson.obbligato.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Junio C Hamano writes: >> I'm happy to do either (rebase or filter-branch). Just let me know. > > I would understand Avery's "should we filter-branch/rebase, or is it OK > as-is?", but I do not understand what you mean by "either rebase or > filter-branch is fine". [...] Content analysis details: (-1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: >> I'm happy to do either (rebase or filter-branch). Just let me know. > > I would understand Avery's "should we filter-branch/rebase, or is it OK > as-is?", but I do not understand what you mean by "either rebase or > filter-branch is fine". Sorry, got mixed up there. I'm not that familiar with filter-branch. Now I understand you do both. :) So have we decided to keep the history? -Dave