Re: [PATCH v2] t4018: introduce test cases for the internal hunk header patterns

[Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>]

Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com> writes:

> Let's introduce some infrastructure to make it easy to create test cases
> for the hunk header patterns and provide a few cases for the cpp pattern.
[...]
>    int WRONG_function_hunk_header (void)
[...]
>    int RIGHT_function_hunk_header (void)
>    {
>            const char *msg = "ChangeMe";

Excellent idea!

> +template <class T> int RIGHT_function_hunk_header (T unused)
> +{
> +	const char *msg = "ChangeMe";
> +	printf("Hello, world, %s\n", msg);
> +	return 0;
> +}

I'd still like to have an extremely contrived overuse of templated
classes, like so:

---- 8< ----
int WRONG_function_hunk_header_preceding_the_right_one (void)
{
	return 0;
}

foo::RIGHT<int*&,1>::operator<<(int bar)
{
	const char *msg = "ChangeMe";
	printf("Hello, world, %s\n", msg);
	return 0;
}

int WRONG_function_hunk_header_following_the_right_one (void)
{
	return 0;
}
---- >8 ----

That will guard us against updating the C++ pattern to something better
but still slightly too simple.

Other than that and Jakub's comments,

Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>

-- 
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch