From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752270Ab1LSGIA (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:08:00 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:55945 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751513Ab1LSGH6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:07:58 -0500 From: Rusty Russell To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: lkml - Kernel Mailing List , Pawel Moll Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] module_param: make bool parameters really bool (core code) In-Reply-To: <20111216195830.GH2419@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <87k45ysf1n.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20111216195830.GH2419@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.6.1-1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:50:59 +1030 Message-ID: <87ty4xnvxw.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:58:30 -0800, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:43:24PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > > module_param(bool) used to counter-intuitively take an int. In > > fddd5201 (mid-2009) we allowed bool or int/unsigned int using a messy > > trick. > > > > It's time to remove the int/unsigned int option. For this version > > it'll simply give a warning, but it'll break next kernel version. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell > > For the rcutorture component: > > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney > Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney > > Given that this portion of the patch is self-sufficient, I have queued > the rcutorture portion of this patch with your signed-off-by, which I > can push for either 3.3 or 3.4 (default is most likely 3.4). Of course, > if you would prefer some other approach, please let me know. Nope, more than happy. Have removed it from my patch. Cheers, Rusty.