From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: Code for v2.6.39 merge window frozen, patches archived Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:09:39 -0700 Message-ID: <87tyf4ju8b.fsf@ti.com> References: <20110314192538.GH7258@atomide.com> <4D7ED788.90307@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog116.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.240]:54783 "EHLO na3sys009aog116.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755031Ab1COPJn (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:09:43 -0400 Received: by pxi3 with SMTP id 3so132595pxi.12 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:09:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4D7ED788.90307@ti.com> (Nishanth Menon's message of "Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:35:44 +0530") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Nishanth Menon Cc: Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Nishanth Menon writes: > Tony Lindgren wrote, on 03/15/2011 12:55 AM: > [..] >> Looks like there's one smartreflex patch that does not seem >> to exist in patchwork though.. So that one is still lurking >> around on the patchwork list of patches until the issue has >> been fixed in patchwork.kernel.org. > Guess it is too late, but am curious: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129933897910785&w=2 > Why has it been dropped from .39(aka archived out)? I dont see any > review comments to the contrary from any maintainers explaining why we > should'nt take it. It didn't make this merge window because I did not get to do a final review in time. It has been a very busy development cycle, and I ran out of time. Kevin