From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Smith Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] C/R: Basic support for network namespaces and devices (v5) Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:07:47 -0800 Message-ID: <87tysqheks.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> References: <1267130595-23637-1-git-send-email-danms@us.ibm.com> <1267130595-23637-3-git-send-email-danms@us.ibm.com> <4B91D1A3.9030404@cs.columbia.edu> <87bpf1idic.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> <4B92D574.1090006@cs.columbia.edu> <871vfuiul6.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Mon\, 08 Mar 2010 09\:53\:20 -0800") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Oren Laadan , containers@lists.osdl.org, den@openvz.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, benjamin.thery@bull.net List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org EB> Can we take advantage of the fact that when you destroy a network EB> namespace the virtual devices in that network namespace are also EB> destroyed? Hmm, that kinda seems like cheating, but maybe so. I'll take a look :) -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center email: danms@us.ibm.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Smith Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] C/R: Basic support for network namespaces and devices (v5) Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:07:47 -0800 Message-ID: <87tysqheks.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> References: <1267130595-23637-1-git-send-email-danms@us.ibm.com> <1267130595-23637-3-git-send-email-danms@us.ibm.com> <4B91D1A3.9030404@cs.columbia.edu> <87bpf1idic.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> <4B92D574.1090006@cs.columbia.edu> <871vfuiul6.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Oren Laadan , containers@lists.osdl.org, den@openvz.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, benjamin.thery@bull.net To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Return-path: Received: from gw0.danplanet.com ([71.245.107.82]:40821 "EHLO mail.danplanet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752241Ab0CHSHu (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:07:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Mon\, 08 Mar 2010 09\:53\:20 -0800") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: EB> Can we take advantage of the fact that when you destroy a network EB> namespace the virtual devices in that network namespace are also EB> destroyed? Hmm, that kinda seems like cheating, but maybe so. I'll take a look :) -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center email: danms@us.ibm.com