From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Monakhov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] dquot interface cleanups v2 Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:52:00 +0300 Message-ID: <87tysxmp9r.fsf@openvz.org> References: <20100303140459.300799061@bombadil.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: jack@suse.cz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f209.google.com ([209.85.218.209]:35254 "EHLO mail-bw0-f209.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754503Ab0CCOwE (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:52:04 -0500 Received: by bwz1 with SMTP id 1so66739bwz.21 for ; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 06:52:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100303140459.300799061@bombadil.infradead.org> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Wed, 03 Mar 2010 09:04:59 -0500") Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Christoph Hellwig writes: > Get rid of the dquot operations that were used for calls from the > filesystems into the dquot code, clean up the namespace for calls > to the dquot code to always be dquot_, and move the few calls into > the dquot code that were in the VFS into the filesystems. > > This version dddresses various comments from Jan and adds a new patch > to get rid of the QUOTA_OK / NO_QUOTA return values. I'm not able to apply the patch set on top of linux-fs-2.6/for_next and linux-fs-2.6/for_next w/o your previous patches Which tree/commit this patch-set is aimed to? > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html