From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.10]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:38:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from liesel.fancy-poultry.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by liesel.fancy-poultry.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0504118ADAF87 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:42:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:42:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87tz03lsid.wl%htd@fancy-poultry.org> From: Heinz Diehl In-Reply-To: <1250693664.4a8c1220018bf@webmail.inmano.com> References: <1250693664.4a8c1220018bf@webmail.inmano.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.14.1 - "Choanoflagellata") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] distributing a linux disk crypted with dm-crypt List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de At Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:54:24 +0200, octane indice wrote: > But every people I give the appliance will have the crypto key which crypt > and decrypt data. So, as a security point of view, it's not acceptable. I'm not shure at all if I understand correctly what you have in mind, but to unlock a LUKS/dmcrypt partition, you have to provide the correct passphrase/keyfile. If you do not, there is no way other than bruteforcing it or an attack towards the encryption itself. The master key itself stays fully encrypted. You can read more here: http://cryptsetup.googlecode.com/svn-history/r42/wiki/LUKS-standard/on-disk-format.pdf