why not preserve file permissions?

[jidanni@jidanni.org]

Why not preserve permissions the way you find them, instead of just
using 644 and 755? It certainly couldn't be more complicated than what
you are doing now, and that way one could do things like use git to
update system administration files across a sneakernet containing e.g.,
# dlocate -lsconf exim4-config|sed 's/ .*//'|sort -u
-rw-r-----
-rw-r--r--
-rwxr-xr-x

> git was made for tracking source code, not 640 files.

On the sneakernet no public patches would be sent, and the
administrator would remember to make the sensitive .git directories
700. And sure, git should enforce umask or no set-uid or whatever when
doing a checkout etc. The deluxe edition of git could even print a
warning: "you are trying to track a 640 file but your .git permissions
are less restrictive." However I recommend no premium or deluxe
editions for now.

> Patches welcome.

Trust me, you don't want "grandpa who forgot the parking brake"
anywhere near your code.