From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:28:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.178]:64803 "EHLO ik-out-1112.google.com") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23620896AbYKKX2v (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:28:51 +0000 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c28so138343ika.0 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:28:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:mail-followup-to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=7RzWmHt4t1T/7c+OCBTtW7T4uzHKnmxiS0OqTCBwp1A=; b=g735Xl+zhtRf331eoISES3KT5IfStaDGKLA8coiNmXs7TIa4xM+wiaZQ1YcLm8s4Qy epk48jX0RsxS3Goy3RQOfyEOzQwXs5QlngHZntuWEnf7B5nGiZ9v55nUg/aJwBRVJAf0 uXwSDmqLqWmkM7L1wuAs8yLnj1UGFNZ7Xot9c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:mail-followup-to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=j6kLUsv6h028Mt6fwkVNvGkUEs3IltyHKvgHiAHy+g/Xonq2kpAK7lfUNQ0q006eMb wKUiAIKJ4bG3ClEWTlwH0M9pgghvd9BWm1YLMsR9Zv6nGYGlnFbpDCNI889vcpbFbH+u CAuufcECGtM2kpU8K77xEFviIBbVnRsSuOfA4= Received: by 10.210.42.20 with SMTP id p20mr9794385ebp.4.1226446131180; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:28:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (79-67-45-8.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [79.67.45.8]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm2315888eyg.9.2008.11.11.15.28.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:28:50 -0800 (PST) From: Richard Sandiford To: Kumba Mail-Followup-To: Kumba ,gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Linux MIPS List , rdsandiford@googlemail.com Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Linux MIPS List Subject: Re: [PATCH]: R10000 Needs LL/SC Workaround in Gcc References: <490A90F4.6040601@gentoo.org> <490C05A9.9070707@gentoo.org> <87abcjibsl.fsf@firetop.home> <490CA4C8.40904@gentoo.org> <87tzargrn4.fsf@firetop.home> <490CEDB9.6030600@gentoo.org> <87prleh2hc.fsf@firetop.home> <490EBDE2.6010709@gentoo.org> <87myggilk2.fsf@firetop.home> <490FF63A.7010900@gentoo.org> <8763mypnhf.fsf@firetop.home> <4917D01B.8080508@gentoo.org> <87y6zphn5b.fsf@firetop.home> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:28:47 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87y6zphn5b.fsf@firetop.home> (Richard Sandiford's message of "Tue\, 11 Nov 2008 23\:13\:20 +0000") Message-ID: <87tzadhmfk.fsf@firetop.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 21256 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: rdsandiford@googlemail.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Richard Sandiford writes: > For avoidance of doubt, I suppose the first thing to ask is: do you get > the segfault with the same checkout after you revert your patch? > It could certainly be transient breakage on trunk, like you say. Looks like it is: PR38052. Richard