From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1JKJBt-0006Ex-7X for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:05:49 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JKJBq-0006Ei-NM for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:05:46 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JKJBp-0006EA-CY for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:05:46 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JKJBp-0006E7-6w for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:05:45 -0500 Received: from smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.27]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JKJBo-000606-NO for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:05:45 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (249-174.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net [145.99.174.249]) by smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0UK5htn058816 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:05:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mgerards@xs4all.nl) From: Marco Gerards To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <87prvmm4i2.fsf@xs4all.nl> <87y7a7i4bx.fsf@xs4all.nl> <200801302040.11174.okuji@enbug.org> Mail-Copies-To: mgerards@xs4all.nl Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:07:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200801302040.11174.okuji@enbug.org> (Yoshinori K. Okuji's message of "Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:40:11 +0100") Message-ID: <87tzkvhybr.fsf@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 Subject: Re: PCI support X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:05:47 -0000 "Yoshinori K. Okuji" writes: > On Wednesday 30 January 2008 18:57, Marco Gerards wrote: >> No objections? Did everyone have a (quick) look at the interfaces? >> >> If I hear nothing, I will commit this patch Friday. > > You didn't check the return value from a hook. Besides that, okay for me. Right, I should do that. Before I commit :-) -- Marco