From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1J4IEt-0000U4-5W for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:50:43 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J4IEr-0000Sd-TT for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:50:41 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J4IEo-0000Oh-Ri for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:50:41 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4IEo-0000OZ-J6 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:50:38 -0500 Received: from smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.25]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J4IEn-0000do-KB for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:50:38 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (249-174.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net [145.99.174.249]) by smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lBHFoMA6099854 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:50:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mgerards@xs4all.nl) From: Marco Gerards To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <20071216153046.GA11912@thorin> <47654D12.1040300@nic.fi> <20071216161927.GA13773@thorin> Mail-Copies-To: mgerards@xs4all.nl Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:52:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20071216161927.GA13773@thorin> (Robert Millan's message of "Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:19:27 +0100") Message-ID: <87tzmhnwsd.fsf@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 Subject: Re: moving ata initialisation to a command X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:50:42 -0000 Robert Millan writes: [...] >> While you are there why not add optional IO-base argument so one could >> use more than one controller lurking in other IO-bases (second/third PCI >> ?). Of course there needs to be some kind of auto detect for easier >> usage for normal users. > > I don't like that. Sounds like a workaround for not having proper PCI > support.. :-/ Right, I plan to add PCI support soon. -- Marco