From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailserv2.iuinc.com (IDENT:qmailr@mailserv2.iuinc.com [206.245.164.55]) by puffin.external.hp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA00964 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:27:21 -0600 Received: from ottawa.linuxcare.com (HELO tarwebok) (216.208.98.2) by mailserv2.iuinc.com with SMTP; 3 Oct 2000 22:28:17 -0000 To: drepper@cygnus.com (Ulrich Drepper) Cc: parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com, debian-hppa@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] glibc 2.1.94 CVS merge, packages on the way, ABI breakage :( References: <87aecl60mf.fsf@linuxcare.com> From: David Huggins-Daines Date: 03 Oct 2000 18:28:07 -0400 Message-ID: <87u2at4l1k.fsf@linuxcare.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-ID: Ulrich Drepper writes: > You never should have GLIBC_2.0 symbols. The shlib-versions file > should have GLIBC_2.2 as the earliest version (third column). Ah, I see what the problem is. It seems that it is my fault :( I take it that libc.so, libm.so, and ld.so should all be versioned with GLIBC_2.2 as the base, then? -- dhd@linuxcare.com, http://www.linuxcare.com/ Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.