From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/bw: Split bandwidth params into platform- and display-IP-specific structs (rev3)
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 18:26:44 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v7cpvg17.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <177879100083.73271.381364137513686543@5ab824fced77>
Patchwork <patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org> writes:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/i915/bw: Split bandwidth params into platform- and display-IP-specific structs (rev3)
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/164567/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_18491 -> Patchwork_164567v3
> ====================================================
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_164567v3 absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_164567v3, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
> External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_164567v3/index.html
>
> Participating hosts (42 -> 40)
> ------------------------------
>
> Missing (2): bat-dg2-13 fi-snb-2520m
>
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_164567v3:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Possible regressions ####
>
> * igt@i915_module_load@load:
> - bat-dg2-9: [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2]
> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_18491/bat-dg2-9/igt@i915_module_load@load.html
> [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_164567v3/bat-dg2-9/igt@i915_module_load@load.html
> - bat-dg2-14: [PASS][3] -> [ABORT][4]
> [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_18491/bat-dg2-14/igt@i915_module_load@load.html
> [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_164567v3/bat-dg2-14/igt@i915_module_load@load.html
> - bat-dg2-8: [PASS][5] -> [ABORT][6]
> [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_18491/bat-dg2-8/igt@i915_module_load@load.html
> [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_164567v3/bat-dg2-8/igt@i915_module_load@load.html
Hm... This shows the warning because DG2 does not use bandwidth
parameters and get_soc_bw_params() rightfully does not cover DG2.
We could just get rid of the warnings in get_soc_bw_params() and
get_display_bw_params() all together. The idea of the warning was to
serve as an aid to the developer, but I guess tracing the null pointer
dereference back to those functions shouldn't be too hard?
Another idea is to make sure that only the functions that use those
parameters make the call to get_{soc,display}_bw_params(). Jani, I know
you preferred the other way around, but maybe this is a compelling
reason for moving the call to the direct users?
--
Gustavo Sousa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-14 19:19 [PATCH v3 0/5] drm/i915/bw: Split bandwidth params into platform- and display-IP-specific structs Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-14 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/i915/bw: Don't call intel_dram_info() too early Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-15 8:26 ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-14 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/i915/bw: Extract platform-specific parameters Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-14 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/i915/bw: Deduplicate intel_sa_info instances Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-14 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] drm/i915/bw: Rename struct intel_sa_info to intel_display_bw_params Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-14 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/i915/bw: Extract get_display_bw_params() Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-14 20:16 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/i915/bw: Split bandwidth params into platform- and display-IP-specific structs (rev2) Patchwork
2026-05-14 20:36 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/bw: Split bandwidth params into platform- and display-IP-specific structs (rev3) Patchwork
2026-05-14 21:26 ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
2026-05-14 21:11 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/bw: Split bandwidth params into platform- and display-IP-specific structs (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v7cpvg17.fsf@intel.com \
--to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.