All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Antoine Tenart <atenart@redhat.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, jiri@resnulli.us,
	edumazet@google.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jhs@mojatatu.com,
	carges@cloudflare.com, kernel-team@cloudflare.com,
	Antoine Tenart <atenart@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v1 0/3] net: sched: refactor qdisc drop reasons into dedicated tracepoint
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 15:46:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v7gbz1ru.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADCXZ1yMkZbRd7ioGw5QQ61OdmYp6misUDoj-s-g7wuoiCHKbg@mail.gmail.com>

Antoine Tenart <atenart@redhat.com> writes:

> On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 12:34:18PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org> writes:
>> > On 05/02/2026 04.04, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> >
>> >> It will presumably require existing users to migrate over
>> >> but sooner we do it the fewer users that have to move?
>> >
>> > I agree. Existing users will loose some details, but the patchset
>> > results in fallback to SKB_DROP_REASON_QDISC_DROP as a drop reason,
>> > which existing tools/users will still handle.
>> > (The more specific drop reason is now avail via trace_qdisc_drop).
>> >
>> > Eric and Toke is this acceptable for your users?
>>
>> I like it! My only concern is that drop monitor tools will see two
>> events for each qdisc drop. I guess that could be relatively
>> straight-forwardly deduplicated in the tool, though? +Antoine who works
>> on Retis to give him a chance to complain if not :)
>
> Thanks for the heads up. We'll have to add support for the new enum
> (pretty straightforward), other than that things should just work.
>
> I'm wondering why not using the drop reason subsys logic to combine the
> qdisc specific enum while not conflicting with drop reasons and allowing
> to inject the qdisc reasons into drop reason enabled helpers as well?

See this prior discussion for how the proposal came to be:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/6be17a08-f8aa-4f91-9bd0-d9e1f0a92d90@kernel.org/

Basically, figuring out which qdisc a drop came from is not possible
with the current drop_reason code.

So it's not just new drop reasons, it's a separate tracepoint with more
information available (qdisc handle, name, etc). So you'll get two
events for qdisc drops with this series (from patch 1):

+		trace_qdisc_drop(q, txq, dev, skb, reason);
+		kfree_skb_reason(skb, SKB_DROP_REASON_QDISC_DROP);


-Toke


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-05 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-04 17:02 [PATCH net-next RFC v1 0/3] net: sched: refactor qdisc drop reasons into dedicated tracepoint Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2026-02-04 17:02 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v1 1/3] net: sched: introduce qdisc-specific drop reason tracing Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2026-02-04 17:03 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v1 2/3] net: sched: sfq: convert to qdisc drop reasons Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2026-02-04 17:03 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v1 3/3] net: sched: sch_cake: use enum qdisc_drop_reason for cobalt_should_drop Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2026-02-05  3:04 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v1 0/3] net: sched: refactor qdisc drop reasons into dedicated tracepoint Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-05  8:48   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2026-02-05 11:34     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2026-02-05 14:15       ` Antoine Tenart
2026-02-05 14:46         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2026-02-05 16:24           ` Antoine Tenart
2026-02-06 14:41             ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2026-02-06 15:04               ` Antoine Tenart
2026-02-06 15:21                 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v7gbz1ru.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=atenart@redhat.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=carges@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.