From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DAE1D74960 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 07:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vWVAR-0000Oa-85; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 02:44:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vWVAD-0000Nr-5Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 02:44:38 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vWVA8-00051W-UC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 02:44:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1766130263; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0FC5KR3VqnCwZpWLWjhIE3yKxwEzM3sGMOhtI0Ufefk=; b=R3coURTklIxyCKoahPJiZ9n5oBwGII8FRbRvpPFmeSRhfutSxql1z05T4ZZwAMbeB3fm2V YsTh+G997TKkPYxE5hEAHHGixoFzOhObkKHe7nTQxOWor6dLGTR5GidG10ULeyskvjJCE2 Zab6yePPaq70UiQhjFqDpAaaeNbdFqA= Received: from mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-230-3xiqMGr4Oa6AznHuASJh8w-1; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 02:44:20 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 3xiqMGr4Oa6AznHuASJh8w-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 3xiqMGr4Oa6AznHuASJh8w_1766130259 Received: from mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D4481956050; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 07:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.45.242.7]) by mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5D451800576; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 07:44:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 712EE21E6A27; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 08:44:16 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: Stefan Weil Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: Report on MAINTAINERS coverage In-Reply-To: <97a6f77e-7a86-4bbc-a20a-b1e1c7bdb537@weilnetz.de> (Stefan Weil via's message of "Thu, 18 Dec 2025 16:57:13 +0100") References: <87h5toc61n.fsf@pond.sub.org> <97a6f77e-7a86-4bbc-a20a-b1e1c7bdb537@weilnetz.de> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 08:44:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87v7i27w6n.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.93 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: 12 X-Spam_score: 1.2 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Stefan Weil via writes: > Am 18.12.25 um 13:45 schrieb Markus Armbruster: >> Back in 2014 (time flies), I posted >>=20 >> Subject: MAINTAINERS leaves too many files uncovered >> Message-ID: <87mw8rumhb.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> >> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87mw8rumhb.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub= .org/ >>=20 >> I updated my findings in 2015, 2016 (at commit e00da552a0d), 2018 (at >> v3.1.0-rc2), and 2023 (at commit 36e9aab3c56, close to v8.2.0). This is >> another update, at v10.2.0-rc4. > > > These two files were contributed by me and most of my initial code is=20 > still unmodified, so I could be added as their maintainer: > > hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c > include/hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.h Thanks! > I had two contributions to the eeprom93xx.c (one made by Thiemo in my=20 > name). Other authors had also two or more contributions: > > 2 Author: Alex Williamson > 2 Author: Anthony Liguori > 2 Author: Aurelien Jarno > 2 Author: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau > 3 Author: Blue Swirl > 3 Author: Juan Quintela > 3 Author: Paolo Bonzini > 5 Author: Markus Armbruster > > I am not sure about the desired order in MAINTAINERS. Therefore I don't=20 > intend to send a patch but would be happy if someone else updates this fi= le. I can take care of it. MAINTAINERS has the nvram device models either under a machine, supposedly the one machine that uses it (e.g. ds1225y.c is under "Jazz"), or in section of its own ("CHRP NVRAM" and "Firmware configuration (fw_cfg)"). As far as I can tell at a glance, eeprom93xx is used by the eepro100 NICs (i82500, i82551, ...), the tulip NIC, and dc390 SCSI HBA. These are all PCI devices available with -device, so not tied to any particular machine type. I guess a section of its own makes sense. Do you agree? If yes, the section goes under the Devices heading. Section order appears to be unsystematic. Next to "CHRP NVRAM"? > For the other files which are von covered by MAINTAINERS, the copyright=20 > notice might help to find possible maintainers: > > grep --no-filename -r -o "Copyright.*" $(cat FILELIST)|sort -i|uniq -ci Yes, but I don't have the time to tackle the long tail myself.