From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F653125A0; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 17:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758820644; cv=none; b=TGkqCr3DxC3r4NiGS7jktC4qyEpcCONeLwmn2b1Dat8HZVr/hm8OL/IkrZzTFHDBD6tBnRSpotT7uLwU7TjZuzn2ZrVAWZyAHCTQ5VDt6bqoNklCT9DGyZwtxkdq26eInji8ZIieYn/VzgXLJD2k6lfceww+xU5ylC/dFLNyf5s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758820644; c=relaxed/simple; bh=b4VzpwgralNUi9L9scHLC0NDtEXl9WZxkYIr9fqv5/I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lUNZrq7HjaevQgp6CDQTxSb46tvwqIUPN6zcIg6vzaaPTP4eyFVeQhllglvcp3xjj7rSjRZDGZpMdSLbhqT7WAMuxKFh7s/UJdMTpP90ka6+bFbBAmzu884n61veRJrnZV2ZSwTyVrFPWrLErSvUxy38Qnlg9SBbfX2nb3HkXRU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=hpY9oTfl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="hpY9oTfl" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 98F47406FA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1758820637; bh=8HHf4Rzw9zLqO7udTqH4NNNLYhKD9oSRMuyK6w7UafU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=hpY9oTflKeB6ex3w6SyrC6mrJ8IR0ulyNydw8SXXD27o3jVykPFWCb3FZC7XHPf30 60ljUEPq5vwxGM5/BT8V66cAfzHuF0TpZuuOAtP9T5cb4zItRLKXuE06IKt+ItnuqS itlute/klXgPvoJZtNHCkx4A2yY8o+N70YzhC+B7RDHh5kUrKI4gRKNZk/btahXAPU enbCvHgGNErGdlg5RKWUF7SGVctfieBeqRKuWAxqYcXmMi+h6FV2csuVbpOset3djN z3hoyUWL6Ez5kLSrbR8oAi+osB8oskQn1B+9YZxGwxJzsUCi33IYrjFqEGjQ7JYC+M 2RMmCzMBu87Vw== Received: from localhost (mi-18-37-83.service.infuturo.it [151.18.37.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98F47406FA; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 17:17:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap , Mark Brown , Akira Yokosawa Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] fixes/improvements for top of docs/build-script In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 11:17:12 -0600 Message-ID: <87v7l6310n.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > Hi Jon, > > This series contain the 3 patches against build-script I sent in > separate: > > - patch 1 solves a problem with Tumbleweed build. I opted to be verbose > at the comments to properly describe what we're addressing and why; > - patch 2 solves an issue that sometimes happen on my machine while checking > for CONFIG_RUST=y; > - patch 3 contains a request from Akira to allow running just the PDF > step when pdfdocs target is selected. OK, I've applied this set to the build-script branch. Thanks, jon