From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D965B6BFC0 for ; Wed, 7 May 2025 20:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746648225; cv=none; b=WLCd7AOsk40NSYPs8GOCoThQlK+w8xOtnEM6K404tmvFpHFnAGy2ZG9oPe5ORE+Rd6bveo4JAGjo048IUigOO/13XnOVZ1yn7W5QQfPDBKOSzxoPj08oxFjKMHXeo5iUPo62xtAqwXj8V/mxcS8KwPR3mgTKwuxO+Yl4Hy6VGfw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746648225; c=relaxed/simple; bh=na/aUtOcSwHgh4cyTX2YVSuj7BSBZAYFelQIEE6jV80=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dMCRkBaLTLCYP1wPhqGyCegsVEvVYWfviLr1kEbI08k+mTTZ5Zl0NCiHt3M1SqBs0kxDHNcBNyUl85xHa6LEnvaXZ2FvGcTVTE8YGwwMpXG4FEhJDr6MSr4Tlig0GQ7w6b4kmbrgtgFL3GETeqflRFoy0K7wF9yTh6N94NVqhEQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=Ngyhr1od; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="Ngyhr1od" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 494F641078 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1746648217; bh=W7hpeEle5EyWZIZllCq1fjRxtMI0bYnu2U9CuxNsweE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Ngyhr1od20TMUMa4PYqJ8n93UgopKTTR+RnUg3GCAUjhkF4mtA70L0/4xm41kEiZx sOWs+nN8VglOTbdIHAAteQlRre0+8vp+1vYvl0L61Uu5kRgyPEcxQR6p9x+TCcZMS5 nsLiVMbHZtLdbMLvPgJoDA5xAitMPMyD9itskaV10rzf6LqTBmDhTr4iwyBpObEw7E tIfrrQIhosuM3UDPHViCxINTERPCL85huMlMY+Qt1gpuMcyBZePQSSMyOO7rjmjs3O 8UZ174oZRbG4vSXmut0iE+ypNpNOBMHsJTLa/YAhjHzNnwRbZc2mn7/d6QKmsJ45bk sT04FNqtT+qQw== Received: from localhost (unknown [151.37.179.100]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 494F641078; Wed, 7 May 2025 20:03:34 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Ming Wen , Rongrong Cao , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" Cc: "mchehab@kernel.org" , Long Li , Jian Tang , Zhao-Yang Chen Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [Kernel 5.15/Kernle 6.1] About Sphinx Doc. In-Reply-To: References: <87jz71lstz.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <87bjsdlp6o.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 14:03:29 -0600 Message-ID: <87v7qctcha.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ming Wen writes: > Hi Rongrong: > =C2=A0 > Thanks for the update. Good to know! > As the next, Jon may help to check a bit why this changelist is missed to= be merged into LTS Kernel 5.15 and even LTS Kernel 6.1. It should definite= ly be needed.=F0=9F=98=8A The stable maintainers need to be told to apply a patch like this, and nobody did that. I will try to have a look in the near future to decide whether that should be done in this case...sorry, I'm on the road, and have a few balls to juggle at the moment. jon