From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32CDB24BBF3; Tue, 6 May 2025 13:01:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746536467; cv=none; b=odeNpqUpakElcjJQOKic6RFYPiLKzUMV3w6OPAsjcbcxTuddGIc6By4vgqCSJ4Gs0bzZk+MXlK8L4wF419cwvv07HQDrBTeh3cGuE0NLWI3an5dBIJjO+29COeFJO6onEnOxlLaPUfFIwUao05AwdhipF43N8DsI8Qy1jHNFva4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746536467; c=relaxed/simple; bh=h6xZS9dC7e4iNV3fhXey6pp7M5IToS1iWD8Re0zXhy0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mhmnzaT+WsCQ08gDewVYQLx2BNb4ts0iFT+u6gX7pvh/N9bcR+BqTvFIisHSbONL2hCMnW+zUUszPrElHzWdL6mKc/D7pTwDokkIUKeU4xXmvVTFG1Sjs6LJGuJxnT3Y2A4YrxzbYcSLg2q50YiM3XIMNZXPb2erpgc/HyX7gNk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=qPnSFf1N; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="qPnSFf1N" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 7517A403A7 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1746536465; bh=Z8cvL+fbKoL0avjcHP6hxGrJDr4rR6GnALatRgdPlck=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=qPnSFf1NLh7OOxzLpm3gHnahPBmFUWq5Oh77IVkeP3uo5vHCiAcl0zNzV/Uuj7YZc xufrYaHyWZOruRW/Ih4Pnjs+kyTyLFSpcR9phzgt35w//eZezUUQXwOVDNXLtchZjC /+2QYeqtFfgvph9Qi/P79u69uox73V0E8wjjyn3lhyGjSYtk+W80yOY4PmrLokPVB5 P+zJrvP/hbuiwIbHkmXqs/brsyvxSKXsa2v98iGXgV87BUGytvaE9K7KG6P6Vvqv5D DtcLuH41emOiUi8feh4He1kdQ0qmwoZfMiJDdvjOr+VlvVfb2Z2sEWXJhbSxJBwhmX anMdjwmIa0P7g== Received: from localhost (mdns.lwn.net [45.79.72.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7517A403A7; Tue, 6 May 2025 13:01:04 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Jesung Yang Cc: workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jesung Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: align with scripts/syscall.tbl migration In-Reply-To: <20250504093351.2134552-1-y.j3ms.n@gmail.com> References: <20250504093351.2134552-1-y.j3ms.n@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 06 May 2025 07:01:01 -0600 Message-ID: <87v7qdx59u.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Jesung Yang writes: > Update the documentation to reflect the migration of the following > architectures to the centralized syscall table format: > > arc, arm64, csky, hexagon, loongarch, nios2, openrisc, riscv > > As of commit 3db80c999debbad ("riscv: convert to generic syscall table"), > these architectures no longer rely on include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h. > Instead, syscall table headers (syscall_table_{32,64}.h) are generated by > scripts/syscalltbl.sh based on entries in scripts/syscall.tbl, with ABIs > specified in arch/*/kernel/Makefile.syscalls. > > For the convenience of developers working with older kernel versions, the > original documentation is fully retained, with new sections added to > cover the scripts/syscall.tbl approach. > > Verified with `make htmldocs`. > > Signed-off-by: Jesung Yang > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240704143611.2979589-1-arnd@kernel.org So this seems fine to me, but I would feel a bit better about it if the relevant architecture maintainers and lists had been copied. Could I convince you to repost with those addresses included? Thanks, jon