From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix return type of mode_valid function hook
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 10:39:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8pp13yp.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YyEP7W/yZAyhNtTX@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 01:55:27PM -0700, Nathan Huckleberry wrote:
>> All of the functions used for intel_dvo_dev_ops.mode_valid have a return
>> type of enum drm_mode_status, but the mode_valid field in the struct
>> definition has a return type of int.
>>
>> The mismatched return type breaks forward edge kCFI since the underlying
>> function definitions do not match the function hook definition.
>>
>> The return type of the mode_valid field should be changed from int to
>> enum drm_mode_status.
>>
>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
>> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1703
>> Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev
>> Signed-off-by: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Thanks for the patch and reviews, pushed to drm-intel-next.
BR,
Jani.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h
>> index d96c3cc46e50..50205f064d93 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h
>> @@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ struct intel_dvo_dev_ops {
>> *
>> * \return MODE_OK if the mode is valid, or another MODE_* otherwise.
>> */
>> - int (*mode_valid)(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo,
>> - struct drm_display_mode *mode);
>> + enum drm_mode_status (*mode_valid)(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo,
>> + struct drm_display_mode *mode);
>>
>> /*
>> * Callback for preparing mode changes on an output
>> --
>> 2.37.2.789.g6183377224-goog
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix return type of mode_valid function hook
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 10:39:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8pp13yp.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YyEP7W/yZAyhNtTX@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 01:55:27PM -0700, Nathan Huckleberry wrote:
>> All of the functions used for intel_dvo_dev_ops.mode_valid have a return
>> type of enum drm_mode_status, but the mode_valid field in the struct
>> definition has a return type of int.
>>
>> The mismatched return type breaks forward edge kCFI since the underlying
>> function definitions do not match the function hook definition.
>>
>> The return type of the mode_valid field should be changed from int to
>> enum drm_mode_status.
>>
>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
>> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1703
>> Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev
>> Signed-off-by: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Thanks for the patch and reviews, pushed to drm-intel-next.
BR,
Jani.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h
>> index d96c3cc46e50..50205f064d93 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h
>> @@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ struct intel_dvo_dev_ops {
>> *
>> * \return MODE_OK if the mode is valid, or another MODE_* otherwise.
>> */
>> - int (*mode_valid)(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo,
>> - struct drm_display_mode *mode);
>> + enum drm_mode_status (*mode_valid)(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo,
>> + struct drm_display_mode *mode);
>>
>> /*
>> * Callback for preparing mode changes on an output
>> --
>> 2.37.2.789.g6183377224-goog
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix return type of mode_valid function hook
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 10:39:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8pp13yp.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YyEP7W/yZAyhNtTX@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 01:55:27PM -0700, Nathan Huckleberry wrote:
>> All of the functions used for intel_dvo_dev_ops.mode_valid have a return
>> type of enum drm_mode_status, but the mode_valid field in the struct
>> definition has a return type of int.
>>
>> The mismatched return type breaks forward edge kCFI since the underlying
>> function definitions do not match the function hook definition.
>>
>> The return type of the mode_valid field should be changed from int to
>> enum drm_mode_status.
>>
>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
>> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1703
>> Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev
>> Signed-off-by: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Thanks for the patch and reviews, pushed to drm-intel-next.
BR,
Jani.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h
>> index d96c3cc46e50..50205f064d93 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h
>> @@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ struct intel_dvo_dev_ops {
>> *
>> * \return MODE_OK if the mode is valid, or another MODE_* otherwise.
>> */
>> - int (*mode_valid)(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo,
>> - struct drm_display_mode *mode);
>> + enum drm_mode_status (*mode_valid)(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo,
>> + struct drm_display_mode *mode);
>>
>> /*
>> * Callback for preparing mode changes on an output
>> --
>> 2.37.2.789.g6183377224-goog
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-15 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-13 20:55 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix return type of mode_valid function hook Nathan Huckleberry
2022-09-13 20:55 ` Nathan Huckleberry
2022-09-13 20:55 ` Nathan Huckleberry
2022-09-13 20:55 ` Nathan Huckleberry
2022-09-13 23:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nathan Chancellor
2022-09-13 23:19 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-09-13 23:19 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-09-15 7:39 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-09-15 7:39 ` Jani Nikula
2022-09-15 7:39 ` Jani Nikula
2022-09-14 10:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2022-09-14 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Andrzej Hajda
2022-09-14 13:47 ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-09-14 13:47 ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-09-15 1:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v8pp13yp.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=nhuck@google.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.