From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 351ADC433EF for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 04:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KZQ2h3WMgz2ywF for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 14:17:48 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=201909 header.b=USlpGx1t; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KZQ224HZ0z2xBv for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 14:17:14 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=201909 header.b=USlpGx1t; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4KZQ205Sr9z4xYM; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 14:17:12 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ellerman.id.au; s=201909; t=1649391434; bh=+0mz5/6ccyYrJwsyIan2Rv2K8PJmRz01AUp5rFy9q2c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=USlpGx1tBA9iIs4Q2LQ35OtgE9MxSPMBZMdejToJ/HKg0u4IIUapwwfZTUc9RHRS2 kJXvZiA1v99zXPlFmI4pF1FoucRYgJLk51lH3fDpnikZ8L6iZtBJfKPvUptqIqv6XQ 7qBORcccG/DIs8go+zMdZFziiomZ2eKbr4aCx3XzOaL7o+l9cz2ln0vQR9Qz+N473n 0KRdOKdSB8R6lZqSDnCtPzFsgUXXYLcXkGtnut1deS1htngyjkErdb4HXBhgzvJz5r Cb2UFe40ja9ZAezUX8YflBzlrmWlU9ws3oachrlRNcpke1xQaDlizRJHvGoIPB6ph3 wZGCWRMikGC8A== From: Michael Ellerman To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] Convert powerpc to default topdown mmap layout (v8) In-Reply-To: <20220310204917.3d42e6cf3088f7cf1c7fe7a6@linux-foundation.org> References: <877d91m7wd.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <20220310204917.3d42e6cf3088f7cf1c7fe7a6@linux-foundation.org> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 14:17:12 +1000 Message-ID: <87v8vk6wfr.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "alex@ghiti.fr" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Paul Mackerras , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "will@kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Andrew Morton writes: > On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:26:42 +1100 Michael Ellerman wrote: > >> > What will be the merge strategy ? I guess it's a bit late to get it >> > through powerpc tree, so I was just wondering whether we could get >> > patches 2 to 5 in mm this cycle, and the powerpc ones next cycle ? >> >> Yeah I didn't pick it up because the mm changes don't have many acks and >> I'm always nervous about carrying generic mm changes. >> >> It would be my preference if Andrew could take 2-5 through mm for v5.18, >> but it is quite late, so I'm not sure how he will feel about that. > > 5.18 isn't a problem. Perhaps you meant 5.17, which would be real tough. Sorry, missed your reply. > Can we take a look after 5.18-rc1? Yes :) cheers From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C7C1C433EF for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 04:18:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=mF2uxHbXoCyCJmP72B7gXVUZZx+vtDQPg+E9uhAgJyM=; b=Y9Q0QcqyuDpmsT tYUZmLqjjNILKZwvAYCnh8fqJnlZQdtQjTCeVQv5yO9OF9n6/txpMjO+z/JNEyYlQpFMwqGLbN/nm bNr7Wfs8N9BJUGFkIIGFlQP5ir8h0r5NDqqUBT+tJ2jDAVfVwkN5gsFp1m3yUg/G9qcgK0oKtJWLr FOs2bBQdkazI9gYGg4yDmu9QO/upi1M6914+Cidr1q3v9IhwthelAUm9fflzq2JCXlWurSzTLN4ID /n3TU+4ABEosUZ9ipbUWz3pyDTm0ZDmCy13YZdTFyDIcFs+cApakG2joQIDKPkQ98H41k+ATa+rgI SCN7ai9aX6LA533wyN8w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ncg3t-00EtoT-Qp; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 04:17:29 +0000 Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org ([150.107.74.76]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ncg3q-00Etm6-H3 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 04:17:28 +0000 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4KZQ205Sr9z4xYM; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 14:17:12 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ellerman.id.au; s=201909; t=1649391434; bh=+0mz5/6ccyYrJwsyIan2Rv2K8PJmRz01AUp5rFy9q2c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=USlpGx1tBA9iIs4Q2LQ35OtgE9MxSPMBZMdejToJ/HKg0u4IIUapwwfZTUc9RHRS2 kJXvZiA1v99zXPlFmI4pF1FoucRYgJLk51lH3fDpnikZ8L6iZtBJfKPvUptqIqv6XQ 7qBORcccG/DIs8go+zMdZFziiomZ2eKbr4aCx3XzOaL7o+l9cz2ln0vQR9Qz+N473n 0KRdOKdSB8R6lZqSDnCtPzFsgUXXYLcXkGtnut1deS1htngyjkErdb4HXBhgzvJz5r Cb2UFe40ja9ZAezUX8YflBzlrmWlU9ws3oachrlRNcpke1xQaDlizRJHvGoIPB6ph3 wZGCWRMikGC8A== From: Michael Ellerman To: Andrew Morton Cc: Christophe Leroy , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "will@kernel.org" , "alex@ghiti.fr" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] Convert powerpc to default topdown mmap layout (v8) In-Reply-To: <20220310204917.3d42e6cf3088f7cf1c7fe7a6@linux-foundation.org> References: <877d91m7wd.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <20220310204917.3d42e6cf3088f7cf1c7fe7a6@linux-foundation.org> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 14:17:12 +1000 Message-ID: <87v8vk6wfr.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220407_211726_768281_3A949E0C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.14 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Andrew Morton writes: > On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:26:42 +1100 Michael Ellerman wrote: > >> > What will be the merge strategy ? I guess it's a bit late to get it >> > through powerpc tree, so I was just wondering whether we could get >> > patches 2 to 5 in mm this cycle, and the powerpc ones next cycle ? >> >> Yeah I didn't pick it up because the mm changes don't have many acks and >> I'm always nervous about carrying generic mm changes. >> >> It would be my preference if Andrew could take 2-5 through mm for v5.18, >> but it is quite late, so I'm not sure how he will feel about that. > > 5.18 isn't a problem. Perhaps you meant 5.17, which would be real tough. Sorry, missed your reply. > Can we take a look after 5.18-rc1? Yes :) cheers _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A815C433EF for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 04:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id CB6AB8D0002; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 00:17:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C65C76B0078; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 00:17:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B2E548D0002; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 00:17:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (relay.hostedemail.com [64.99.140.27]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A236C6B0075 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 00:17:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin10.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0076B7 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 04:17:17 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79332402114.10.5530A60 Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) by imf17.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529FC40004 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 04:17:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4KZQ205Sr9z4xYM; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 14:17:12 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ellerman.id.au; s=201909; t=1649391434; bh=+0mz5/6ccyYrJwsyIan2Rv2K8PJmRz01AUp5rFy9q2c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=USlpGx1tBA9iIs4Q2LQ35OtgE9MxSPMBZMdejToJ/HKg0u4IIUapwwfZTUc9RHRS2 kJXvZiA1v99zXPlFmI4pF1FoucRYgJLk51lH3fDpnikZ8L6iZtBJfKPvUptqIqv6XQ 7qBORcccG/DIs8go+zMdZFziiomZ2eKbr4aCx3XzOaL7o+l9cz2ln0vQR9Qz+N473n 0KRdOKdSB8R6lZqSDnCtPzFsgUXXYLcXkGtnut1deS1htngyjkErdb4HXBhgzvJz5r Cb2UFe40ja9ZAezUX8YflBzlrmWlU9ws3oachrlRNcpke1xQaDlizRJHvGoIPB6ph3 wZGCWRMikGC8A== From: Michael Ellerman To: Andrew Morton Cc: Christophe Leroy , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "will@kernel.org" , "alex@ghiti.fr" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] Convert powerpc to default topdown mmap layout (v8) In-Reply-To: <20220310204917.3d42e6cf3088f7cf1c7fe7a6@linux-foundation.org> References: <877d91m7wd.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <20220310204917.3d42e6cf3088f7cf1c7fe7a6@linux-foundation.org> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 14:17:12 +1000 Message-ID: <87v8vk6wfr.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Stat-Signature: 9f7ec7h8fz4m8pdydz7io3dwjj14bxz9 Authentication-Results: imf17.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=ellerman.id.au header.s=201909 header.b=USlpGx1t; spf=pass (imf17.hostedemail.com: domain of mpe@ellerman.id.au designates 150.107.74.76 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mpe@ellerman.id.au; dmarc=none X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 529FC40004 X-HE-Tag: 1649391436-980132 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Andrew Morton writes: > On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:26:42 +1100 Michael Ellerman wrote: > >> > What will be the merge strategy ? I guess it's a bit late to get it >> > through powerpc tree, so I was just wondering whether we could get >> > patches 2 to 5 in mm this cycle, and the powerpc ones next cycle ? >> >> Yeah I didn't pick it up because the mm changes don't have many acks and >> I'm always nervous about carrying generic mm changes. >> >> It would be my preference if Andrew could take 2-5 through mm for v5.18, >> but it is quite late, so I'm not sure how he will feel about that. > > 5.18 isn't a problem. Perhaps you meant 5.17, which would be real tough. Sorry, missed your reply. > Can we take a look after 5.18-rc1? Yes :) cheers